اثربخشی آموزش شناختی – رفتاری بر میزان ترس و اضطراب ناشی از کرونا و اختلال وسواس فکری عملی زنان خانه دار در شرایط بیماری کووید 19

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

کارشناسی ارشد روانشناسی بالینی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تهران غرب، تهران ، ایران (نویسنده مسئول)

10.22034/fh.2023.708836

چکیده

مقدمه: اضطراب کرونا استرس ای است که از ترس مبتلا شدن به ویروس کرونا رو می دهد که بیشتر به دلیل مبهم بودن بیماری میباشد. این پژوهش با هدف بررسی اثربخشی آموزش شناختی – رفتاری بر میزان ترس و اضطراب ناشی از کرونا و اختلال وسواس فکری عملی زنان خانه دار در شرایط بیماری کووید 19انجام شد.
روش پژوهش: این پژوهش نیمه آزمایشی با دو گروه آزمایش و کنترل می باشد و جامعه آماری پژوهش کلیه جامعه ی پژوهش شامل تمـامی زنان خانه دار در فاصله سنی 25 تا 50 سال است کـه شـرایط ورود بـه مطالعـه را داشتند. با توجه به روش پژوهش با استفاده از روش نمونه گیری در دسترس30 نفر انتخاب به طور تصادفی به دو گروه آزمایش و کنترل تقسیم شدند(15 نفربرای هر گروه) گمارده شدند. گردآوری داده ها توسط پرسشنامه های ترس و اضطراب ناشی از کرونا و اختلال وسواس فکری عملی انجام شد و مداخله توسط پروتکل طرحواره درمانی انجام شد. همچنین از روش آماری تحلیل کواریانس چند متغیره(مانکوا) جهت تحلیل داده ها استفاده شد.
یافته ها: نتایج حاکی از آن بود که در مجموع تفاوت معنادار بین نمره کل و خرده مقیاس های دو پرشسنامه ترس و اضطراب ناشی از کرونا و اختلال وسواس فکری عملی در پیش آزمون و پس آزمون در دوگروه آزمایش و کنترل در زنان خانه دار وجود داشت.
نتیجه گیری: بر اساس یافته ها می توان نتیجه گرفت که آموزش شناختی رفتاری بر تمامی متغیرهای وابسته تأثیرگذار بوده است و بیشترین تاثیر آن بر متغیر وسواس فکری عملی بوده است و باعث کاهش وسواس فکری عملی شده است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

The effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral training on the level of fear and anxiety caused by corona and practical obsessive-compulsive disorder of housewives in the condition of covid-19 disease

نویسنده [English]

  • Nasrin Bigdlo
Master of Clinical Psychology, Islamic Azad University, Tehran West Branch, Tehran, Iran (corresponding author)
چکیده [English]

Introduction: Corona anxiety is the stress caused by the fear of contracting the corona virus, which is mostly due to the vagueness of the disease. This research was conducted with the aim of investigating the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral training on the level of fear and anxiety caused by Corona and practical obsessive-compulsive disorder of housewives in the condition of covid-19 disease.
Research method: This is a semi-experimental study with two experimental and control groups, and the statistical population of the study includes all housewives between the ages of 25 and 50 who met the conditions to enter the study. According to the research method, 30 people were randomly selected and divided into two experimental and control groups (15 people for each group). Data collection was done by questionnaires of fear and anxiety caused by Corona and practical obsessive-compulsive disorder, and the intervention was done by schema therapy protocol. Also, the statistical method of multivariate covariance analysis (MANCOVA) was used to analyze the data.
Findings: The results indicated that there was a significant difference between the total score and the subscales of the two questionnaires of fear and anxiety caused by Corona and obsessive-compulsive disorder in the pre-test and post-test in the experimental and control groups in housewives.
Conclusion: Based on the findings, it can be concluded that cognitive behavioral training has had an impact on all dependent variables, and its greatest impact has been on the variable of practical obsession and has reduced practical obsession.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • cognitive-behavioral
  • fear and anxiety caused by Corona
  • practical obsessive-compulsive disorder
  • obsession

Cognitive-behavioral training on the level of fear and anxiety caused by Corona and practical obsessive-compulsive disorder of housewives in the condition of covid-19 disease

Nasrin Bigdlo*[1]

Master of Clinical Psychology, Islamic Azad University, Tehran West Branch, Tehran, Iran (corresponding author), nasrinuniteh76@gmail.com 

Abstract:

Introduction: Corona anxiety is the stress caused by the fear of contracting the corona virus, which is mostly due to the vagueness of the disease. This research was conducted with the aim of investigating the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral training on the level of fear and anxiety caused by Corona and practical obsessive-compulsive disorder of housewives in the condition of covid-19 disease.

Research method: This is a semi-experimental study with two experimental and control groups, and the statistical population of the study includes all housewives between the ages of 25 and 50 who met the conditions to enter the study. According to the research method, 30 people were randomly selected and divided into two experimental and control groups (15 people for each group). Data collection was done by questionnaires of fear and anxiety caused by Corona and practical obsessive-compulsive disorder, and the intervention was done by schema therapy protocol. Also, the statistical method of multivariate covariance analysis (MANCOVA) was used to analyze the data.

Findings: The results indicated that there was a significant difference between the total score and the subscales of the two questionnaires of fear and anxiety caused by Corona and obsessive-compulsive disorder in the pre-test and post-test in the experimental and control groups in housewives.

Conclusion: Based on the findings, it can be concluded that cognitive behavioral training has had an impact on all dependent variables, and its greatest impact has been on the variable of practical obsession and has reduced practical obsession.

Keywords: cognitive-behavioral, fear and anxiety caused by Corona, obsession, practical obsessive-compulsive disorder

Citation: Bigdloo N. Cognitive-behavioral training on the level of fear and anxiety caused by Corona and practical obsessive-compulsive disorder of housewives in the condition of covid-19 disease, Family and health, 2023; 13(3): 73-86

Received: 12/ March/ 2023                           Accepted: 8/ April/ 2023  

 

Introduction:

Infectious diseases that is, epidemic diseases such as smallpox, AIDS, influenza and Ebola originate from unknown factors that cause many complications for humans which can cause physical and psychological as well as cultural and social complications. Behavioral changes, such as transmitting information away from human populations, such as home quarantine, being away from populations and participating in antiviral treatments, have been effective to a large extent in different countries, although these changes are effective on physical health, but in general, they could not have the effects to eliminate the mental illness and even some solutions such as long-term quarantine alone have psychological consequences such as post-traumatic stress, confusion, aggression, hopelessness, exhaustion, financial failures, and labeling for people (1). This virus has faced a big challenge due to its ability to transmit quickly and also its invisibility. Researchers have found that psychological disorders such as panic, anxiety, depression, fear, denial and despair are the main traumatic psychological reactions in most of the injured people and people exposed to disease outbreaks (2). In the era of corona disease, susceptible people become extremely anxious, so that these people experience anxiety and fear throughout the day and in different situations, and it disrupts the positive efficiency of their lives and causes widespread changes in sleep and appetite. It also causes mood swings. In fact, the pressure and stress caused by the Covid-19 virus has caused people who have the background to become obsessed with practicality. Cleaning takes place to the point where it becomes extreme and disrupts their normal life (3). Fear is the defense mechanisms of people that help them in dangerous situations to give necessary and fundamental reactions to threatening situations. However, the lack of appropriateness between the level of fear and current conditions causes various psychological disorders such as practical obsession, panic, depression and anxiety (3). One of the most common and debilitating mental disorders is obsessive-compulsive disorder, which is one of the treatment-resistant disorders in psychology and was separated from anxiety disorders in the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders.

Obsessions include thoughts or repetitive compulsions that a person consciously carries out, which increases anxiety in a person, although doing compulsive actions along with obsessions is an attempt to reduce anxiety, but always to reduce it. Anxiety does not lead (2).

Anxiety is an unpleasant and vague feeling with fear and anxiety that has an unknown source and causes physiological arousal (4). Corona anxiety is the stress caused by the fear of contracting the corona virus, which is mostly due to the vagueness of the disease. Since this disease has widely increased mortality, it has a significant potential for negative effects on mental health, especially in people with psychological disorders (5).

Considering the wide range of human problems, one of the effective training methods that play an important role in regulating psychological characteristics is cognitive-behavioral training. In cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), people are trained in revising and evaluating negative thoughts. The therapist encourages his clients to examine their thinking and negative hypotheses through behavioral exercises (6). This method of therapy is less focused on the person's past and emphasizes more on finding the meaning, purpose and future of the person (7). The basic premise of the cognitive-behavioral approach is that cognition affects emotion and behavior, and more than the events themselves, people respond to their cognitive representation of events (6). Therefore, with these interpretations, the question that this research seeks to answer is whether cognitive behavioral training is effective in reducing the amount of fear and anxiety caused by coronavirus and obsessive compulsive disorder.

 

Research method:

This research is a semi-experimental or semi-experimental study with a pre-test-post-test design with a control group in terms of its practical purpose and in terms of the nature of the implementation and the way of collecting information. The research population includes all housewives between the ages of 25 and 50 who do not have a history of depression and anxiety. In order to determine the sample size according to the statistical population, 90 people who met the entry and exit criteria were selected from among the housewives who were affected by the Covid-19 disease in the period of April to June 1401, and the fear questionnaire. Anxiety caused by Corona and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder was distributed among people. 30 people who scored equal to or higher than the cutoff score in the questionnaires were randomly selected and replaced in two experimental (15 people) and control (15 people) groups. Then, Parkman's cognitive behavioral therapy training program was implemented for the experimental group during 9 90-minute sessions by a trained researcher, and during this period, the control group did not receive any intervention. After the end of the educational program, the questionnaires were administered again for both groups as a post-test. SPSS software version 26 is used to analyze the data of this research. Descriptive (mean, standard deviation, skewness and kurtosis) and inferential statistical methods (Shapiro and Wilk test, multivariate covariance analysis) were used. The following tools were used in the study:

Corona Anxiety Scale: This tool has been prepared and validated to measure anxiety caused by the spread of the Corona virus in Iran. The final version of this tool has 18 items and 2 components (factors). Items 1 to 9 measure psychological symptoms and items 10 to 18 measure physical symptoms. This tool is scored on a 4-point Likert scale (never = 0, sometimes = 1, most of the time = 2, and always = 3); Therefore, the highest and lowest scores obtained by respondents in this questionnaire are between 0 and 54. High scores in this questionnaire indicate a higher level of anxiety in people. The reliability of this tool was obtained using Cronbach's alpha method for the first factor (α=0.879), the second factor (α=0.861) and for the whole questionnaire (α=0.919). Also, Gottman's λ-2 value was obtained for the first factor (λ-2=0.882), the second factor (λ-2=0.864) and for the whole questionnaire (λ-2=0.922). In order to check the validity of the correlation with the criteria of this questionnaire, it was used to correlate this tool with the GHQ-28 questionnaire, and the results showed that the Corona anxiety questionnaire with the total score of the GHQ-28 questionnaire and the anxiety component, physical symptoms, impairment in social functioning and depression respectively It is equal to 0.483, 0.507, 0.418, 0.333 and 0.269 and all these coefficients were significant at the 0.01 level.

Mosley's Practical Obsession: This questionnaire was prepared by Hodgson and Rachman (1977) for the purpose of research on the type and scope of obsessive problems. The implementation of this questionnaire is very quick and easy. Because there are 30 statements whose answers are true or false (8). This questionnaire contains 30 items, half with correct key and half with incorrect key. This questionnaire contains 30 items, half with correct key and half with incorrect key. This questionnaire has two options, a general score, and several separate scores for control, washing, slowness/repetition, and doubt. Rachman and in the initial validation at Maudsley Hospital, 50 obsessive-compulsive patients were not well differentiated from 50 psychiatric treatments. has done. Subsequent content analysis of 100 patients' responses identified four major components that reflected four types of obsessive-compulsive disorder in patients. These four components are: inspection, cleanliness, slowness and obsessive doubt. Of course, there was a fifth component that could be called rumination, but this component was only weighted on two items. Therefore, based on the analysis of the mentioned cases, four subscales were formed. By using a simple scoring method, you can get a general obsessional score and four sub-scores. The designers of this test have prepared a correction key for this questionnaire. If the person's answers are consistent with the correction key, the subject will receive one mark in that subject, and if the person's answer is not consistent with the key, the person's score in those subjects will be zero. The maximum score of the subject in the scales of this questionnaire are:

1- The total score of obsessions is maximum 30

2- The maximum score of the verification scale is 9

3- Maximum washing scale score is 11

4- Slow repetition scale score of maximum 7

5- Points of doubt-conscientiousness scale maximum 7

The reliability and validity of the Maudsley Obsession Test has been confirmed in studies conducted on clinical samples from different countries. For example, Sanavio obtained a correlation of 0.70 between Madsley and Padua total test scores. The reliability coefficient calculated between test-retest was high (0.89) (9). And in two studies in Iran, the average of this test for obsessive-compulsive patients was 15.75 (standard deviation 5.63) and 14.67 (standard deviation 5.76) (10) Correlation between the total scores of the Madsley test and the Padua test reported 0.70 and the calculated reliability coefficient between test and retest was 0.89. Andoz, Sahibi and Tabatabai (11) reported the reliability coefficient of the whole test as 0.72.

Table 1: The implementation process of cognitive behavioral therapy training

Session

Treatment process

First session

Getting to know the members and specifying the rules and providing a preface of the importance and necessity of cognitive-behavioral approach training.

second session

Talking about the fear of negative evaluation and emotional maturity and presenting thought patterns, emotional state and behaviors and finally relaxation exercises are also done.

Third session

Explaining the relationship between thoughts, emotions and bodily sensations and presenting numerous examples in different situations, explaining thinking errors and negative spontaneous thoughts, describing the nature of stress, presenting the three important components of anxiety and stress (physical, cognitive, behavioral) and the interaction between these three components.

Fourth session

Introducing and identifying the types of common negative thoughts and cognitive distortions, investigating the awareness of the impact of pleasant and unpleasant events on feelings, thoughts and bodily sensations, real exposure and role-playing, teaching calmness

Fifth Session

Emphasis on replacing rational thoughts with illogical thoughts and relaxation

sixth session

Training, practicing and implementing effective coping strategies, dealing with interpersonal triggers, teaching communication skills and self-expression, physical relaxation training, active responsibility, sitting meditation (presence of mind from sounds and thoughts), assigning tasks for the next week, distribution Pamphlets.

Seventh session

Continuous training, practice and implementation of effective coping strategies, anger management training, sleep hygiene

Eighth Session

Teaching expressiveness without violating the rights of others and using different methods to communicate and identify interpersonal style

Ninth session

Teaching the importance and understanding the benefits of social support and an overview of the program

Findings:

Variable scores of corona anxiety in two groups in the experiment and the control group in the pre-test and post-test stages are given in Table 2.

Table2: Descriptive indices of variable scores of Corona anxiety in experimental and control groups in pre-test and post-test

Variable

Group

Pre-test

Post-test

Mean

standard deviation

skewness

Elongation

Mean

standard deviation

skewness

Elongation

Examination

Psychiatric symptoms

23.13

2.232

-0.815

-1.106

12.93

1.710

-0.772

0.440

Control

23.33

1.839

-0.250

-0.823

21.53

2.850

-0.734

0.251

Examination

Physical symptoms

 

19.33

1.543

-0.513

-0.375

10.27

1.944

0.979

1.567

Control

21.80

2.145

-1.155

0.588

19.33

3.337

-0.728

-0.433

Examination

Corona anxiety

42.47

3.314

-0.339

-1.609

23.33

3.155

0.071

-0.814

Control

45.13

3.852

-0.852

-0.123

41.60

6.685

-0.908

0.446

In Table 3, the variable scores of obsessive-compulsive symptoms of Corona in the experimental and control groups are described in the pre-test and post-test.

 

Table 3: Descriptive indices of variable scores of Corona anxiety in the experimental and control groups in the pre-test and post-test

Variable

Group

Pre-test

Post-test

Mean

standard deviation

skewness

Elongation

Mean

standard deviation

skewness

Elongation

Examination

Verification

8.13

0.640

-0.103

-0.127

1.73

0.799

0.555

-1.132

Control

8.13

0.640

0.103

-0.127

8.13

0.640

0.103

-0.127

Examination

Wash

8.53

1.87

0.795

-0.304

1.80

0.676

0.256

-0.505

Control

8.80

0.941

-0.142

-0.849

8.53

0.990

-0.360

-0.753

Examination

slow repetition

5.60

0.828

0.070

-0.224

1.60

0.737

0.841

-0.470

Control

5.67

0.976

0.256

-1.131

5.60

0.828

0.070

-0.224

Examination

Hesitation – Conscientiousness

5.60

0.507

-0.455

-1.094

1.60

1.056

1.640

0.173

Control

5.53

0.516

-0.149

-1.308

5.67

0.488

-0.788

-1.615

Examination

Obsessive-practical

24.67

2.193

1.007

-0.388

6.40

2.298

-0.199

-1.008

Control

24.93

2.017

0.466

-1.086

24.47

1.922

0.685

-0.418

According to this table, there is a difference between the pre-test and post-test scores in the experimental group in the total score of the Corona anxiety variable. Also, in this table, the amount of skewness and elongation of the data can be seen that the skewness and elongation of all components are within the range of (2 to -2), so it can be said that the data has a normal distribution.

Table 4. Skewness and skewness of the data and the assumption of normality of the variables in the experimental and control groups

Variable

test

Pre-test

Post-test

skewness

Elongation

skewness

Elongation

Examination

Psychiatric symptoms

 

-0.815

-1.106

-0.772

0.440

Control

-0.250

-0.823

-0.734

0.251

Examination

Physical symptoms

 

-0.513

-0.375

0.979

1.567

Control

-1.155

0.588

-0.728

-0.443

Examination

Corona anxiety

 

-0.339

-1.609

0.071

-0.814

Control

-0.852

-0.123

-0.908

0.446

Examination

Verification

 

-0.103

-0.127

0.555

-1.132

Control

0.103

-0.127

0.103

-0.127

Examination

Wash

0.795

-0.304

0.256

-0.505

Control

-0.142

-0.849

-0.360

-0.753

Examination

slow repetition

0.070

-0.224

0.841

-0.470

Control

0.256

-1.131

0.070

-0.224

Examination

Hesitation - Conscientiousness

 

-0.455

-1.094

1.640

0.173

Control

-0.149

-1.308

-0.788

-1.615

Examination

Obsessive-practical

1.007

-0.388

-0.199

-1.008

Control

0.466

-1.086

0.685

-0.418

The above table shows the normality of the skewness and skewness of the variables. After checking the normality of the skewness or the skewness of the data distribution, we go to the Shapiro-Wilk test to make sure that the data is normal in this research.

Table 5. The results of the Shapiro-Wilk test on the normality of the data in the experimental group

Variable

test

Shapiro-Wilk

statistics

Degrees of freedom

meaningful

Examination

Psychiatric symptoms

 

0.779

15

0.201

Control

0.992

15

0.209

Examination

Physical symptoms

 

0.880

15

0.476

Control

0.933

15

0.299

Examination

Corona anxiety

 

0.867

15

0.305

Control

0.986

15

0.826

Examination

Verification

 

0.790

15

0.765

Control

0.783

15

0.240

Examination

Wash

0.836

15

0.109

Control

0.801

15

0.785

Examination

slow repetition

0.883

15

0.502

Control

0.755

15

0.350

Examination

Hesitation - Conscientiousness

 

0.630

15

0.078

Control

0.597

15

0.980

Examination

Obsessive-practical

0.811

15

0.515

Control

0.908

15

0.128

According to the results obtained in Table 5 and the level of significance that is more than 0.05, it is possible to assume that the data obtained from the variables of corona anxiety in the experimental group are normal with high confidence. As a result, our null hypothesis is not rejected and parametric statistical models can be used. The research hypothesis of cognitive behavioral training is effective on the amount of fear and anxiety caused by corona and practical obsessive-compulsive disorder of housewives in the condition of covid-19 disease.

Table 6. The results of the Mbox test to check the homogeneity of the covariance matrix of the components of the Corona Anxiety Questionnaire

BOX S M

F

Degree of freedom 1

Degree of freedom 2

Degree of freedom 3

9.563

2.941

3

141120.000

0.318

According to Table 6, the level of significance is greater than 0.05, which indicates that the homogeneity condition of the covariance matrix has been well met for the components of the Corona Anxiety Questionnaire (F = 3.571 and p ≤ 0.05), which means that the covariance matrices observed between different groups are equal.

Table7. Multivariate covariance results on the post-test scores of dependent variable components with pre-test control.

Test

Value

F

The degree of freedom of the hypothesis

Error degree of freedom

Significance level

Pillai effect

0.982

696.762

2

25

0.001

Wilks Lambda

0.018

696.762

2

25

0.001

Hotelling's work

55.741

696.762

2

25

0.001

The biggest root of error

55/741

696.762

2

25

0.001

According to Table 8, with the pre-test control, the significance levels of all tests are less than 0.05 and it indicates that there is a significant difference between the test and control groups in at least one of the dependent variables, and it means that cognitive behavioral training has an effect on the level of fear. And the anxiety caused by Corona and the intellectual and practical obsession of housewives has an effect in the conditions of the disease of Covid-19.

 

 

 

Table 8. Post-test covariance analysis of dependent variable components by removing the pre-test effect.

The dependent variables

Source of changes

sum of squares

Degrees of freedom

average of squares

The amount of F

Significance level

Effect size

Corona anxiety

group

1818.650

1

1818.650

73.346

0.001/000

0.338

error

644.638

26

24.796

 

 

 

Practical obsession

group

2127.842

1

2127.842

1300.634

0.001

0.480

error

42.536

26

42.536

 

 

 

Considering the amount of F and the level of significance in the above table, which is less than 0.05, the null hypothesis is rejected. That is, there is a significant difference between the average scores of the variables of practical obsession and anxiety caused by Corona in the two experimental and control groups in the post-test. Also, by examining the table of descriptive statistics and comparing the average scores of the variables of practical obsession and anxiety caused by Corona in the two groups It can be concluded that cognitive-behavioral training is effective to a great extent on the level of fear and anxiety caused by Corona and practical obsessive-compulsive disorder of housewives in the conditions of covid-19 disease. Also, by emphasizing the size of the effect, it can be seen that cognitive behavioral training has an effect on the amount of fear and anxiety caused by Corona and practical obsessive-compulsive disorder of housewives in the condition of covid-19 disease and the practical obsessive-compulsive disorder of housewives in the condition of covid-19 disease. According to the effect size, the effect size for fear and anxiety caused by Corona is 0.338 and for practical obsession it is 0.480. In fact, it can be concluded that cognitive-behavioral training had an effect on all dependent variables, and its greatest effect was on the variable of practical obsession, and it reduced practical obsession.

Discussion and conclusion:

According to the obtained results, the main hypothesis, cognitive behavioral training is effective on the amount of fear and anxiety caused by Corona and practical obsessive-compulsive disorder of housewives in the condition of covid-19 disease, was confirmed and the results indicate that in There is a significant difference between the average scores of anxiety variable caused by Corona and practical obsessive-compulsive disorder of housewives in the condition of covid-19 disease of two groups in the post-test, and the educational program has reduced anxiety caused by Corona and has the greatest effect on the variable of practical obsessive-compulsive disorder. These results are in line with the research findings of Taghvi Karamalki and Moheb (12), Bagheri and Sadeghi (13), Shushtri, Rezaei and Taheri (14) and Wakefield and colleagues (15). In explaining the results of this research, it can be said that cognitive behavioral therapy causes a change in people's beliefs and attitudes, so that the person discards ineffective attitudes and beliefs and replaces them with efficient and logical beliefs, in other words, the approach of cognitive behavioral therapy compared to treatments Another cognition, in a deep way, can make a person feel better about himself and the surrounding world by correcting his attitude and beliefs, because it changes and corrects his beliefs and thinking patterns and reduces the level of anxiety in a person. And this reduction of anxiety can also reduce a person's compulsive behaviors. In fact, the cognitive behavioral approach is the most effective approach in reducing the symptoms of the disease, which is effective through reducing anxiety and improving relationships with others, increasing self-esteem and generally improving the quality of life during the corona epidemic (13).

This approach may be especially beneficial for people who believe that they cannot control environmental risks, in other words, they have extremely negative beliefs about the effectiveness of control and management on re-tending to addiction disease, so one of the mechanisms Cognitive behavioral therapy is a change of belief and attitude in people, so that a person discards ineffective attitudes and beliefs and replaces them with efficient and logical beliefs. Attitudes and beliefs make a person feel better about himself and the surrounding world because it changes and corrects beliefs and thinking patterns in a person, so according to these explanations, it can be said that cognitive behavioral therapy can reduce the symptoms of anxiety caused by the disease. Corona is very effective and reduces the anxiety and behaviors caused by it such as obsessive behaviors in the person. In fact, the cognitive behavioral approach is the most effective approach in reducing psychological problems.

Research limitations:

Due to the limited research community in Tehran, it is suggested that future researchers conduct this research in a wider environment. It is also suggested to pay special attention to the possibility of suffering from psychological disorders in the post-corona era, and develop treatment plans to increase psychological adaptation. It should be considered with the focus on improving mental health.

Conflict of interest:

In this study, no conflict of interest was mentioned among the researchers.

Application of research:

The findings of this research can be useful for students and psychologists who are involved with patients with anxiety disorders.

 

  • Azimi M., Moradi A., Hosni J.. The effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy on emotion regulation in people with comorbid insomnia and depression. Scientific Research Quarterly in Psychological Health, 2016; 11(1): 49-61, URL: http://rph.khu.ac.ir/article-1-2858-en.html [in Persian]
  • Reuman L., Jacoby R. J., Blakey S. M., Riemann B.C., Leonard R.C., Abramowitz J.S. Predictors of illness anxiety symptoms in patients with obsessive compulsive disorder. Psychiatry research, Scientific Research Quarterly in Psychological Health, 2016; 11(1): 52, DOI: 1016/j.psychres.2017.07.012
  • Freeman D., Waite F., Startup H., Myers E., Lister R., McInerney J., Harvey A.G., Geddes J., Zaiwalla Z., Luengo-Fernandez L., Foster R., Clifton L., Yu L.M.. Efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy for sleep improvement in patients with persistent delusions and hallucinations (BEST): a prospective, assessor-blind, randomized controlled pilot trial, Lancet Psychiatry, 2015; 2: 975–83, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ S2215-0366(15)00314-4,
  • Altaf A., Janjua N. Z., Kristensen S., Zaidi N., Memon A., Hook E., Shah S. A.  High-risk behaviors among juvenile prison inmates in Pakistan. Public Health, 2009; 123(7):470-5, DOI:1016/j.puhe.2009.06.001, [in Persian]
  • Thorsen M.M., Patena J.V., Guthrie K.M., Spirito A., Ranney M.L.. Using high-risk adolescents′ voices to develop a comprehensible cognitive behavioral therapy–based text-message program. Behavioral Medicine, 2018; 44(2):  89–99.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08964289.2016.1223597
  • Peterson C., Park N., Seligman M. E.. Orientations to Happiness and Life Satisfaction: The Full Life versus the Empty Life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2005; 6: 25-41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-004-1278-z
  • Li J., Jin J., Xi S., Zhu Q., Chen Y., Huang M., He, C. Clinical efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy for chronic subjective tinnitus. American Journal of Otolaryngology, 2018; 40(2): 121, DOI:1016/j.amjoto.2018.10.017
  • Izadi R., Abedi M.R., Mpein S. Factor Structure, Reliability and Validity of Vancouver Obsessional Compulsive Inventory (VOCI), Thought & Behavior in Clinical Psychology, 2013; 23(7): 57-90, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/351841836
  • Rachman S.J., Hodgson R.J.. Obsessions and Compulsions. New York: Prentice- Hall; 1980v
  • Ghassemzadeh H., Khamseh A., Ebrahimkhani N.. Demographic variables and clinical features of obsessive-compulsive disorder In Iranian patients (Second report), In B. E. Ling (Ed.), Obsessive-compulsive disorder research. New York: Nova Science Publishers, Inc; 2005: 243-271
  • Andouz Z, Sahebi A, Tabatabai S M. Comparing Efficacy and Effectiveness of ERP and DIRT Methods in Treatment of Compulsive Washing. IJPCP, 2005; 11 (2) :139-149
    URL: http://ijpcp.iums.ac.ir/article-1-67-fa.html
  • Taghavi Garamaleki M., Moheb N.. The Effectiveness of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy on Rumination, Worry and Anxiety Sensitivity in People with Anxiety Disorders, Journal of Instructio and Evaluation, 2021; 14(53): 59, doi:10.30495/jinev.2021.683359, [in Persian]
  • Bagheri Sheykhangafshe F, Sadeghi Chookami E. Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder during the Coronavirus Epidemic 2019 (COVID-19): Letter to the Editor. J Shahid Sadoughi Uni Med Sci 2020; 28(6): 2700-4. https://doi.org/10.18502/ssu.v28i6.4149, [in Persian]
  • Shushtri A., Rezaei A.M., Taheri E.. The effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy on emotion regulation, metacognitive beliefs and rumination in divorced women. Journal of principles of mental health, 2015; 18(6): 121 https://jfmh.mums.ac.ir/jufile?ar_sfile=280304 [in Persian]
  • WakefieldDelgadillo J., Kellett S., White S., Hepple J. The effectiveness of brief cognitive analytic therapy for anxiety and depression: A quasi-experimental case—control study, Clinical psychology, 2021; 17: 123, https://doi.org/10.1111/bjc.12278