اثربخشی زوج درمانی گاتمن بر بهبود طلاق عاطفی ، الگوهای ارتباطی و تحمل پریشانی زنان مراجعه کننده به مراکز مشاوره منطقه سه تهران

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 مشاوره، واحد رودهن، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، رودهن، ایران

2 استادیار دانشگاه گروه مشاوره، واحد رودهن، ایران

3 استادیار گروه مشاوره.واحد رودهن، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، رودهن، ایران

چکیده

چکیده
مقدمه: مشکلات روان شناختی در زنان ممکن است نظام خانواده را  تحت تاثیر قرار داده و باعث تغییراتی در نظام خانواده شود. وجود این مشکلات روان شناختی در زنان اغلب باعث مشکلات و تنش‌هایی در زندگی آنها می‌شود که سلامت روان آن‌ها را هدف قرار می‌دهد ، بنابراین، این پژوهش بدنبال این سوال است که آیا زوج‌درمانی  گاتمن بر  بهبود طلاق عاطفی، الگوهای ارتباطی و تحمل پریشانی در زنان مراجعه‌کننده به مراکز مشاوره منطقه سه تهران است یا خیر؟
روش پژوهش: این پژوهش نیمه آزمایشی و به‌صورت پیش‌آزمون-پس‌آزمون با گروه کنترل انجام شد. جامعه آماری پژوهش را کلیه زنان مراجعه‌کننده به مراکز مشاوره منطقه سه تهران در سال 1397 تشکیل می‌دادند که از این بین  24نفر در گروه آزمایش(زوج درمانی گاتمن) و 24 نفر در گروه کنترل قرار گرفت که این تعداد به روش تصادفی در گروه ها تقسیم شدند. گروه آزمایش  ده جلسه دو ساعته زوج درمانی گاتمن آموزش دیدند. ابزار جمع‌آوری اطلاعات شامل پرسشنامه طلاق عاطفی، الگوهای ارتباطی و تحمل پریشانی بود که گروه ها پرسشنامه ها را در مراحل پیش آزمون و پس آزمون تکمیل کردند. برای تجزیه ‌وتحلیل داده‌ها از آزمون کوواریانس چند متغیری استفاده شد. 
یافته‌ها: نتایج این تحقیق نشان داد بین گروه‌های زوج‌درمانی  گاتمن و کنترل بر طلاق عاطفی، الگوهای ارتباطی و تحمل پریشانی در زنان مراجعه‌کننده به مراکز مشاوره منطقه سه تهران تفاوت معنی‌داری وجود دارد (001/0 > p).
نتیجه‌گیری: تحقیقات قبلی نشان داده است که زوج‌درمانی گاتمن باعث بهبودی سازگاری و چهار اسب سوارکار شده است و  می‌تواند به زوج‌هایی که از طلاق عاطفی رنج می‌برند کمک کند.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Effectiveness of Guttman Couple Therapy on Improving Emotional Divorce, Communication Patterns and Stress Tolerance of Women Referring to Counseling Centers in Tehran's Third District

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mahbin SoleymanBrojerdi 1
  • Farideh Dokaneifard 2
  • Simindokht Rezakhani 3
1 Ph.D. Student, Department of Counseling, Islamic Azad University, Roudehen Branch, Tehran, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Counseling, Islamic Azad University, Roudehen Branch, Tehran, Iran
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Counseling, Islamic Azad University, Roudehen Branch, Tehran, Iran

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Guttman Couples Therapy" Emotional Divorce" Communication Patterns" Distress Tolerance
  1. Abbey C, Dallos R. The experience of the impact of divorce on sibling relationships: a qualitative Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 2004; 9:241–259.
  2. Arcuri A. Dyadic perfectionism, communication patterns and relationship quality in couples; 2013.‏
  3. Asanjarani F, Jazayeri R, Fatehizade M, Etemadi O, De Mol J. The effectiveness of fisher’s rebuilding group intervention on divorce adjustment and general health of Iranian divorced women. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage. 2018; 59(2):108-122.‏
  4. Babcock JC, Gottman JM, Ryan KD, Gottman JS. A component analysis of a brief psycho‐educational couples' workshop: one‐year follow‐up results. Journal of Family Therapy. 2013; 35(3): 252-280
  5. Backhaus S, Neumann D, Parrott D, Hammond FM, Brownson C, Malec J. Investigation of a new couples intervention for individuals with brain injury: a randomized controlled trial. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 2019; 100(2): 195-204.‏
  6. Barzoki MH, Tavakoll M, Burrage H. Rational-Emotional ‘Divorce’in Iran. Applied Research in Quality of Life. 2015; 10(1): 107-122.‏
  7. Bruns KM, O'Bryan EM, McLeish AC. An Examination of the Association Between Emotion Reactivity and Distress Tolerance Among College Students. The Journal of nervous and mental disease. 2019; 207(6): 429-432.
  8. Caughlin JP, Huston TL. A contextual analysis of the association between demand/withdraw and marital satisfaction. Personal Relationships. 2002; 9:95-119. doi:10.1111/1475-6811.00007
  9. David P. Wedding the Gottman and Johnson approaches into an integrated model of couple therapy. The Family Journal. 2015; 23(4): 336-345.‏
  10. Davoodvandi M, Nejad SN, Farzad V. Examining the effectiveness of gottman couple therapy on improving marital adjustment and couples' intimacy. Iranian journal of psychiatry. 2018;13(2): 135.
  11. Doorley JD, Kashdan TB, Alexander LA, Blalock DV, McKnight PE. Distress tolerance in romantic relationships: A daily diary exploration with methodological considerations. Motivation and Emotion. 2019; 1-12.‏
  12. Elsayed F. The Effectiveness of a Counseling Program Based on Reality Therapy to Improve Marital Adjustment among Emotionally Separated Saudi Wives. Sylwan Journal. 2016; 160:343-362.
  13. Garanzini S, Yee A, Gottman J, Gottman J, Cole C, Preciado M, Jasculca C. Results of Gottman method couples therapy with gay and lesbian couples. Journal of marital and family therapy. 2017; 43(4): 674-684.‏
  14. Gilleard C. Change in Family and Household Structure. In Old Age in Nineteenth-Century Ireland (pp. 33-47). Palgrave Pivot, London; 2017.
  15. Glasser W. Warning: Psychiatry can be hazardous to your mental health. HarperCollins Publishers; 2003.
  16. Gottman JM, Tabares A. The effects of briefly interrupting marital conflict. Journal of marital and family therapy. 2018; 44(1): 61-72.‏
  17. Hardesty JL, Ogolsky BG, Raffaelli M, Whittaker A. Relationship dynamics and divorcing mothers’ adjustment: Moderating role of marital violence, negative life events, and social support. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. 2019; 1(3): 59-63.
  18. Haskins NH, Appling B. Relational‐Cultural Theory and Reality Therapy: A Culturally Responsive Integrative Framework. Journal of Counseling & Development. 2017;95(1): 87-99.‏
  19. Henderson A, Robey PA, Dunham SM, Dermer SB. Change, choice, and home: An integration of the work of Glasser and Gottman. International Journal of Choice Theory and Reality Therapy. 2013; 32(2): 36-47.
  20. Jalali N, Heydari H, Davoudi H, Al-e-Yasin SA. Comparison of Effectiveness of Emotion-focused Couple Therapy and Gottman’s Relationships Enrichment Program on Women’s Fear of Intimacy. International Journal of Behavioral Sciences. 2018; 12(2): 76-83.‏
  21. Jewell J, Schmittel M, McCobin A, Hupp S, Pomerantz A. The children first program: The effectiveness of a parent education program for divorcing parents. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage. 2017; 58(1): 16-28.‏
  22. Lee ES. Effects of a happiness choice program based on reality therapy on subjective well-being and interpersonal relations in nursing students. Journal of Korean Public Health Nursing. 2015; 29(3): 503-514.‏
  23. Leyro TM, Zvolensky MJ, Bernstein A. Distress tolerance and psychopathological symptoms and disorders: A review of the empirical literature among Psychological Bulletin. 2011; 136(4): 576-600. doi:10.1037/a0019712
  24. Li PF, Johnson LN. Couples’ depression and relationship satisfaction: examining the moderating effects of demand/withdraw communication patterns. Journal of Family Therapy. 2018; 40: S63-S85.‏
  25. Mitchell JW, Gamarel KE. Constructive Communication Patterns and Associated Factors Among Male Couples. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy. 2017; 17(2): 79–96.
  26. Naderi H, Feghhi H, Joibari FY, Enshaee N, Tadayon M. The efficiency of reality therapy instruction upon the rate of life's qualification and marital conflicts of addicted spouses. J UMP Soc Sci Technol Manag. 2015;  3(3): 531-5.
  27. Odac H, Çelik ÇB. Group Counselling on College Students’ Internet Dependency and Life Satisfaction. Journal of psychologists and counsellors in schools. 2017; 27(2): 239-250.‏
  28. Rajaei A. Effectiveness of couple therapy by Gottman method on reducing emotional divorce, improving verbal-non-verbal relationships and reducing interpersonal cognitive distortions of conflicting couples. Master's thesis, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad; 2015.
  29. Rajaei A, Daneshpour M, Robertson J. The Effectiveness of Couples Therapy Based on the Gottman Method Among Iranian Couples With Conflicts: A Quasi-Experimental Study. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy. 2019; 1-18.‏
  30. Robinson M, Ross J, Fletcher S, Burns CR, Lagdon S, Armour C. The Mediating Role of Distress Tolerance in the Relationship Between Childhood Maltreatment and Mental Health Outcomes Among University Students. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 2019; 20(1):15-18.
  31. Symoens S, Colman E, Bracke P. Divorce, conflict, and mental health: How the quality of intimate relationships is linked to post‐divorce well‐ Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 2014; 44(3):220-233.‏
  32. Vahidiborji G, Jadidi M. The Study of Effectiveness of Reality Therapy on Adjustment of Female Adolescent with Anxiety. J Psychol Clin 2017; 7(1): 00414.
  33. Wubbolding RE. The Three-fold Legacy of William Glasser, M.D. International Journal of Choice Theory and Reality Therapy. 2017; 37(1):14-27.
  34. Yao YW, Chen PR, Chiang-shan RL, Hare TA, Li S, Zhang JT, Fang XY. Combined reality therapy and mindfulness meditation decrease intertemporal decisional impulsivity in young adults with Internet gaming disorder. Computers in Human Behavior. 2017; 68(1): 210-216.‏
  35. Zarei E, Boroomand R, Sadeghifard M, Najarpourian S, Askari M. The Comparison of the effectiveness of group counseling based on Gottmanś theory and Glasserś choice theory on increasing marital satisfaction and decreasing marital conflicts in married women. Hormozgan Medical Journal. 2018; 22(2): 77-86.
  36. McHugh RK, Daughters SB, Lejuez CW, Murray HW, Hearon BA, Gorka SM, Otto MW. Shared variance among self-report and behavioral measures of distress intolerance. Cognitive therapy and research. 2011; 35(3): 266-275.
  37. Howell AN, Leyro TM, Hogan J, Buckner JD, Zvolensky MJ. Anxiety sensitivity, distress tolerance, and discomfort intolerance in relation to coping and conformity motives for alcohol use and alcohol use problems among young adult drinkers. Addictive behaviors. 2010; 35(12), 1144-1147.
  38. González-Val R, Marcén M. Unemployment, marriage and divorce. Applied Economics. 2018; 50(13): 1495-1508.
  39. Thoits PA. Stress and health: Major findings and policy implications. Journal of health and social behavior. 2010; 51(1_suppl): S41-S53.
  40. Amato PR. The consequences of divorce for adults and children: An update. Društvena istraživanja: časopis za opća društvena pitanja. 2014; 23(1): 5-24.
  41. Pirak A, Negarandeh R, Khakbazan Z. Post-Divorce Regret among Iranian Women: A Qualitative Study. International journal of community based nursing and midwifery. 2019; 7(1): 75.
  42. Rahman MM, Giedraitis VR, Akhtar MT. The social sanction of divorce: Who ultimately pay the social costs of its adverse effects?. Sociology and Anthropology. 2013; 1(1): 26-33.
  43. Asioni bare JBA, Olowonirejuoro OA. Family cohesion and level of communication betwees and their adolescent childeren. TNJGC. 2006; 11:52-60.
  44. Byrne M, Carr A, Clark M. The Efficacy of Behavioral Couples Therapy and Emotionally Focused Therapy for Couple Distress”, Contemporary Family Therapy. 2014; 26 (16): 361-387.
  45. Schaap CPDR. Communication and adjustment in marriage: comparative frequential and sequential analysis of the verbal and nonverbal facets of the interaction of nondistressed and distressed married couples during a. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger; 1982.
  46. Schaap C, Buunk B, Kerkstra A. Marital conflict resolution. Multilingual Matters; 1988.
  47. Gordon KC, Baucom DH, Epstein N, Burnett CK, Rankin LA. The interaction between marital standards and communication patterns: How does it contribute to marital adjustment? Journal of Marital and Family Therapy. 1999; 25: 211-223.
  48. Heavey CL, Christensen A, Malamuth NM. The longitudinal impact of
    demand and withdrawal during marital conflict. Journal of Consulting and
    Clinical Psychology. 1998; 63:797-801.
  49. Kincaid SB, Caldwell RA. Marital separation: Causes, coping, and
    Journal of Divorce & Remarriage. 1995; 22: 109-128.
  50. Sher T, Weiss RL. Negativity in marital communication: Where's the
    beef? Behavioral Assessment. 1991; 13 (1): 1-5.
  51. Punyanunt-Carter NM. Reported affectionate communication and satisfaction in marital and dating relationships. Psychological Reports. 2014; 95: 1154-1160.
  52. Cornelius TL, Alessi G. Behavioral and physiological components of
    communication training: Does the topic affect outcome? Journal of Marriage and
    2007; 69:608-620.
  53. Smith L, Heaven PCL, Ciarrochi J. Trait emotional intelligence, conflict
    communication patterns, and relationship satisfaction. Personality and Individual
    2008; 44: 1314-1325.
  54. Rippetoe PA, Rogers R. Effects of components of protection-motivation theory on adaptive and maladaptive coping with a health threat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1987; 52: 596-604.
  55. Manne S, Badr H, Zaider T, Nelson C, Kissane D. Cancer-related communication, relationship intimacy, and psychological distress among couples coping with localized prostate cancer. Journal of Cancer Survivorship. 2010; 4(1): 74-85.