نقش واسطه‌ای خودکارآمدی در رابطه سرشت و منش و عاطفه مثبت و منفی با احساسات شرم و گناه: ارائه یک مدل ساختاری

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری روانشناسی عمومی، واحد تهران مرکز، دانشگاه ازاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران

2 نویسنده مسئول:‌ استاد گروه روانشناسی تربیتی دانشگاه خوارزمی تهران، تهران، ایران

3 استادیار گروه روانشناسی دانشگاه خوارزمی تهران، تهران، ایران Hadihashemirazini@yahoo.com, 0000-0003-0046-0149

4 استادیار گروه روانشناسی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تهران مرکزی، تهران، ایران

چکیده

مقدمه: امروزه تلاش‌های زیادی برای بررسی عوامل موثر در احساسات شرم و گناه صورت می‌گیرد. هدف: پژوهش حاضر نقش واسطه‌ای مهارت‌های خودکارآمدی در رابطه سرشت و منش و عاطفه مثبت و منفی با  احساسات شرم و گناه: ارائه یک مدل ساختاری انجام شد.
روش پژوهش: این پژوهش به لحاظ هدف بنیادی، به لحاظ نحوه گردآوری اطلاعات توصیفی از نوع همبستگی، داده ها کمی و به صورت میدانی انجام می‌شود. جامعه آماری این پژوهش شامل کلیه دانشجویان دختر و پسر دانشگاه‌های آزاد در شهر تهران در سال تحصیلی 139۹-139۸ خواهد بود. روش نمونه­گیری در این تحقیق، تصادفی چند مرحله­ای می‌باشد. ترتیب مراحل نمونه­گیری به این شکل است که ابتدا لیست دانشگاه‌های شهر تهران آزاد تهیه و به روش تصادفی ساده چهار دانشگاه انتخاب می‌شوند. با توجه به نوع پژوهش که بر مبنای مدل یابی و تدوین مدل ساختاری می‌باشد تعداد نمونه‌های ۵۰۰ نفری متوسط،  نمونه‌های ۷۰۰ نفری خوب و ۱۰۰۰ نفری عالی است. لذا در این پژوهش از نمونه‌‌ای  ۷۰۰ نفری استفاده خواهد شد. داده ها به روش مدل معادلات ساختاری مورد تحلیل قرار گرفت.
یافته‌ها: نتایج پژوهش نشان داد که مدل پیشنهادی مورد نظر تدوین مدل ساختاری احساسات شرم و گناه بر اساس سرشت و منش و عاطفه مثبت و منفی با نقش واسطه‌‌ای  خودکارآمدی از برازش لازم برخوردار است. و مسیرهای مستقیم و غیرمستقیم در تبیین احساسات شرم و گناه معنی دار است.
نتیجه گیری: با توجه به این نتایج، آموزش عاطفه مثبت باعث کاهش احساسات شرم و گناه می‌شود و به تبع آن باعث افزایش خودکارآمدی می­شود، پیشنهاد  می­گردد

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Intermediary role of self-efficacy in relations with temperament and character and positive and negative affections with shame and guilt: presenting a structural model

نویسندگان [English]

  • Maryam Maghumi 1
  • Parvin Kadivar 2
  • Hadi Hashemi Zarrini 3
  • Mozhghan SepahMansoor 4
1 Doctoral student of General Psychology, Islamic Azad University Central Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran. Maryam.maghoomi@yahoo.com
2 Corresponding author: Head professor of Educational Psychology, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Tehran, Iran, Kadivar220@yahoo.com
3 Assistant professor of Psychology, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Tehran, Iran, Hadihashemirazini@yahoo.com
4 Assistant professor of Psychology, Islamic Azad University Central Tehran Branch, Tehran, Tehran drsepahmansour@yahoo.com,
چکیده [English]

Introduction: Concerning the many attempts made to understand the affecting factors of feeling of shame and guilt, this research aims to learn the Intermediary role of self-efficacy in relations with temperament, character and positive and negative emotions with shame and guilt to present a structural model.
Method: Research methodology of this study is fundamental, descriptive data gathering is done in a correlational fashion, data is numerical and the research is done through case study. The statistical universe of this study includes all female and male students of Islamic Azad Universities in Tehran in the academic year of 1398-1399. Sampling in this study is randomized and multi-stage. The respective sequence of data gathering is as stated in the following: First we prepare the lists of Islamic Azad Universities in Tehran and choose four of them in a randomized fashion. According to the basis of this study, modeling and developing a structural model, population of 500 people is mediocre, population of 700 is good and population of 1000 is the best. Hence the population of this study will contain 700 of the students of Islamic Azad Universities in Tehran. Data is analyzed through structural equations method.
Results: Outcomes of this research states that the relations between the intermediary role of self-efficacy and the proposed structural model of shame and guilt based on temperament, character and positive and negative emotions fits the necessary criteria and the direct and undirect ways of showing feelings of shame and guilt is meaningful. According to the results, direct effect of temperament and character on feeling of shame is respectively 0.13 and 0.21 and the effect of positive affections of feeling of shame in 0.10 and significant.
Conclusions: According to these results, positive affection training will reduce feelings of shame and guilt and consequently increases self-efficacy; hence positive affection training is suggested.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Positive and Negative affections" Shame and Guilt
  • " Self-efficacy" Temperament and Character
  1. Mills RSJDr. Taking stock of the developmental literature on shame. 2005; 25(1): 26-63.

    1. Stuewig J, Tangney JP, Heigel C, Harty L, McCloskey LJJorip. Shaming, blaming, and maiming: Functional links among the moral emotions, externalization of blame, and aggression. 2010;44(1):91-102.
    2. Bruno S, Lutwak N, Agin M. Conceptualizations of guilt and the corresponding relationships to emotional ambivalence, self-disclosure, loneliness and alienation. Personality and Individual Differences. 2009;47:487-91.
    3. Ahmed E, Braithwaite V. "What, Me Ashamed?” Shame Management and School Bullying. 2004;41(3):269-94.
    4. Cherry M, Taylor P, Brown S, Rigby J, Sellwood W. Guilt, shame and expressed emotion in carers of people with long-term mental health difficulties: A systematic review. Psychiatry Research. 2017; 249.
    5. Tangney JP, Tracy JL. Self-conscious emotions. In: Leary, M., Tangney, J. (Eds.), Handbook of Self and Identity2nd ed. 2, editor. New York: Guilford Press; 2012: 446-78.
    6. Zakiei A, Karami JJMJoTUoMS. Relationship of alexithymia, positive affect and negative affect with mental disorders. 2013;35(4):38-45.
    7. Mohammadi N. The factor structure of state and trait forms of positive and negative affect scales. Journal of Behavioral Sciences. 2011;5(1):21-6.
    8. Egloff BJP, Differences I. The independence of positive and negative affect depends on the affect measure. 1998; 25(6):1101-9.

    10.Waikar SV, Craske MGJJoAD. Cognitive correlates of anxious and depressive symptomatology: An examination of the helplessness/hopelessness model. 1997;11(1):1-16.

    11.Tarlow EM, Haaga DAJJoRiP. Negative self-concept: Specificity to depressive symptoms and relation to positive and negative affectivity. 1996; 30(1):120-7.

    12.Robazza C, Bortoli L, Nocini F, Moser G, Arslan CJPoS, Exercise. Normative and idiosyncratic measures of positive and negative affect in sport. 2000;1(2):103-16.

    13.Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen AJJop, psychology s. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. 1988; 54(6): 1063.

    14.McDermut JF, Haaga DA, Bilek LAJCT, Research. Cognitive bias and irrational beliefs in major depression and dysphoria. 1997; 21: 459-76.

    15.Calev AJP. Affect and memory in depression: Evidence of better delayed recall of positive than negative affect words. 1996; 29(2):71-6.

    16.Mertol S, Alkın TJJoAD. Temperament and character dimensions of patients with adult separation anxiety disorder. 2012; 139(2):199-203.

    17.Sadock BJ, Sadock VA. Kaplan and Sadock’s Synopsis of Psychiatry: Behavioral Sciences/Clinical Psychiatry. Edition t, editor. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007.

    18.Gana K, Trouillet R. Structure invariance of the Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI). Personality and Individual Differences. 2003; 35: 1483-95.

    19.Bandura AJPr. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. 1977; 84(2): 191.

    20.Bandura AJAp. Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. 1982;37(2):122.

    21.Bandura AJJobt, psychiatry e. The assessment and predictive generality of self-percepts of efficacy. 1982;13(3):195-9.

    22.Parvaz Y, Khanipour H, Parvaz P. Role of Self-conscious Emotions (Shame-proneness, Guilt Proneness) and Attribution Style in Prediction of General Psychiatric Symptoms, J Modern Psychological Researches. 2015;9(35):33-48.

    23.Rajabi G, Abasi Ga. Examining the relationship between self-criticism, social anxiety and fear of failure with shyness in college students. J Research in Clinical Psychology and Counseling. 2012;1(2):24

    24.Cohen TR, Wolf ST, Panter AT, Insko CAJJop, psychology s. Introducing the GASP scale: a new measure of guilt and shame proneness. 2011;100(5):947.

    25.Jokar b, Kamali f. Relation Between Spirituality and the Feeling of Shame and Sin, J. 2015;5(14):3-20.

    26.hashemi s, Dortaj F, Sadipour E, Asadzadeh H. Structural model of shame and guilt feelings based on parenting styles: The mediating role of attachment styles, J Journal of Applied Psychology. 2017;11(1):475-93.

    27.Cloninger CR, Przybeck TR, Svrakic DM. The Tridimensional Personality Questionnaire: U.S. normative data. Psychological reports. 1991;69(3 Pt 1):1047-57.

    28.Kaviani H, Poor Naseh M. Validation Of Temperament And Character Inventory (TCI) In Iranian Sample: Normative Data, J Tehran University Medical Journal. 2005;63(2):89-98.

    29.Schwarzer R, Jerusalem MJA, Stress,, Coping. The general self-efficacy scale (GSE). 2010;12(1):329-45.

    30.Delavar A, Najafi M. The psychometric properties of the general self efficacy scale among university staff, J Quarterly of Educational Measurement. 2013;3(12):87-104.

    31.Wei, Meifen, Shaffer, A P, Young, K S, et al. adult Attachment, Shame, Depression, and Loneliness: The Mediation Role of Basic Psychological Needs Satisfaction. J Counseling Psychology. 2005;52(4).

    32.Akbag M, Erden Çınar S. The Prediction of Gender and Attachment Styles on Shame, Guilt, and Loneliness. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice. 2010;10.

    33.Passanisi A, Sapienza I, Budello S, Giaimo F. The Relationship Between Guilt, Shame and Self-Efficacy Beliefs in Middle School Students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2015;197:1013-7.

    34.Gross CA, Hansen NJP, differences i. Clarifying the experience of shame: The role of attachment style, gender, and investment in relatedness. 2000;28(5):897-907.

    35.C HK, R S. Attachment styles, emotion expressiveness and guilt among college women. Minneapolis, MN. 2001.

    36.Bartholomew KJJoS, relationships P. Avoidance of intimacy: An attachment perspective. 1990;7(2):147-78.

    37.Schimmenti AJPP. Unveiling the hidden self: Developmental trauma and pathological shame. 2012;18(2):195-211.

    38.Hejdenberg J, Andrews BJP, Differences I. The relationship between shame and different types of anger: A theory-based investigation. 2011;50(8):1278-82.

    39.Tangney JP, Dearing RL. Shame and guilt: Guilford press; 2003.

    40.Pace U, Zappulla CJJoC, Studies F. Problem behaviors in adolescence: The opposite role played by insecure attachment and commitment strength. 2011; 20: 854-62.

    41.Bandura AJEp. Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. 1993;28(2):117-48.

    42.Bandura A, Wessels S. Self-efficacy: na; 1994.

    43.Bandura AJJom. On the functional properties of perceived self-efficacy revisited. Sage publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA; 2012: 9-44.

    44.Harrison TL. Parenting styles and self-forgiveness: Are guilt and shame mediators?: Trevecca Nazarene University; 2012.

    45.Lagacé‐Séguin DG, d'Entremont MRLJECD, Care. The role of child negative affect in the relations between parenting styles and play. 2006;176(5):461-77.

    46.Birami M, Alaei P. Shame and guilt: the relationship between moral emotions and parenting styles. The second national conference of family psychology; Iran. https://civilica.com/doc/246918/2010.

    47.Zarei S, Farahbakhsh K, Esmaeili M. The Determination of the Share of Self-differentiation, Trust, Shame,and Guilt in the Prediction of Marital Adjustment, J Knowledge & Research in Applied Psychology. 2017;12(45):51-63.

    48.Porter RH, Laney MDJM-PQoB, Development. Attachment theory and the concept of inclusive fitness. 1980; 26(1):35-51.

    49.Wagner P, E.T, J.P. Affective style, aspects of the self, and psychological symptoms. George Mason University; 1991.

    50.Lopez FG, Mauricio AM, Gormley B, Simko T, Berger E. Adult Attachment Orientations and College Student Distress: The Mediating Role of Problem Coping Styles. 2001;79(4):459-64.

    51.Wei M, Heppner P, Mallinckrodt B. perceived Coping as a Mediator between Attachment and Psychological Distress: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach. J Counseling Psychology. 2003;50:438-47.

    52.Simpson JA. Influence of Attachment Styles on Romantic Relationships. J Personality and Social Psychology. 1990;59:971-80.

    53.Consedine NS, Magai C. Attachment and emotion experience in later life: the view from emotions theory. Attachment & human development. 2003;5(2):165-87.

    54.Leary MR, Koch EJ, Hechenbleikner NR. Emotional responses to interpersonal rejection. In M. R. Leary (Ed.), Interpersonal rejectio. New York: Oxford University Press.; 2007.

    55.Besharat MA, Koochi S, Dehghani M, Farahani H, Momenzadeh S. Survey of Moderating Role of Positive and Negative Affections on the Relationship between Alexithymia and Experience of Pain in Chronic Pain Patients, J Clinical Psychology and Personality. 2013;10(2):103-13.

    56.Oreyzi HR, Nasery Mohammadabadi A, Askari A. The role of positive affect in relation between pain and stress, and negative affect inemployed women, J Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences. 2010;20(75):55-63.

    57.Soltanizadeh M, Malekpour M, Neshat Doost H. A study of the relationship between physical pleasure, positive and negative affect in Esfahan University students, J Psychological Studies. 2008;4(1):31-46.

    58.Nadari F, Haydari A, Mashalpor A. J Woman and Culture. woman and cultuer. 2009; 1(2): 4-15