اثربخشی آموزش واقعیت درمانی ( تئوری انتخاب) بر نقش گیری اجتماعی و خود متمایز سازی زوجین

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

استادیار دانشگاه ازاد واحد تهران شمال گروه روان شناسی

چکیده

یکی از عوامل مهمی‌ که باعث شکل‌گیری رضایت در روابط بین‌فردی به‌ویژه روابط زوجین می‌شود نقش‏گیری‌اجتماعی‌است. خود‌متمایز سازی یا تمایز‌یافتگی‌شخصیتی نیز که رابطه‌ای قوی با نقش‌گیری‌اجتماعی دارد در‌این زمینه سهم قابل توجهی بر عهده‌اش است. هدف پژوهش حاضر، بررسی اثر‌بخشی آموزش واقعیت‌درمانی مبتنی بر تئوری انتخاب بر نقش-گیری‌اجتماعی و خود‌متمایز‌سازی‌ زوجین بود که از نظر هدف کاربردی و به لحاظ روش شبه آزمایشی با طرح پیش آزمون-پس آزمون با گروه کنترل همراه مرحله پیگیری است. از میان کلیه زوجین مراجعه کننده به‌مراکز مشاوره مناطق 2 و 5 شهر تهران در سال 1397تعداد 30 زوج که به صورت نمونه‌گیری در‌دسترس انتخاب شده‌بودند به‌طور تصادفی در دوگروه آزمایش(15 زوج) و کنترل(15 زوج) گمارده شدند. گروه آزمایش 10 جلسه 90 دقیقه‏ای‌ مورد مداخله قرار‌گرفتند. آزمودنی‌ها در سه‌مرحله پیش‌آزمون، پس‌آزمون و پیگیری، پرسشنامه‌‌های نقش‌گیری‌اجتماعی و تمایزیافتگی‌ را تکمیل کردند. جهت بررسی نتایج از تحلیل واریانس با اندازه‌گیری مکرر استفاده شد. یافته‌ها نشان داد تفاوت معناداری در سطح (P<0/01) در میانگین (انحراف‌معیار) نمرات نقش‌گیری‌اجتماعی گروه آزمایش در پس‌آزمون(2/2)26/1 و پیگیری(2/2)26/2 و همچنین خود‌متمایز‌سازی‌ در سطح (P<0/05) در پس‌آزمون (3/3)36/3 وجود داشت؛ اما میانگین نمرات خود‌‌‌متمایزسازی در مرحله پیگیری(2/1)34/8 معنادار نبود. با توجه به نتایج به‌دست آمده، می‌توان از آموزش واقعیت‌درمانی مبتنی بر تئوری انتخاب به ‌عنوان روشی مناسب و موثر در مداخلات زوج‌درمانی و در مشاوره پیش از ‌‌‌ازدواج استفاده نمود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

The effectiveness of reality therapy (choice theory) on couple's social's role taking and Self-differentiation

نویسنده [English]

  • zahra sadat pour seyyed aghaei
Assistant Professor
چکیده [English]

One of the important factors that shape satisfaction in interpersonal relationships, especially marital relationships, is social role-taking. Personality differentiation, which has a strong relationship with social role-taking, also plays a significant role in this regard. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effectiveness of fact-based education, therapy based on choice theory on couples' social's role taking and Self-differentiation, which is applied in terms of purpose and quasi-experimental method with pre-test-post-test design with control group. Among all couples referring to counseling centers in districts 2 and 5 of Tehran in 2017, 30 couples who were selected by available sampling were randomly assigned to experimental (15 couples) and control (15 couples). The experimental group underwent 10 sessions of 90 minutes. Subjects completed questionnaires of social role taking and Self-differentiation in three stages of pre-test, post-test and follow-up. Analysis of variance with repeated measures was used to evaluate the results. The results showed that there was a significant difference in the level (P <0.01) in the mean and standard deviation of the experimental's social role-taking scores in the post-test and follow-up as well as self- differentiation in the level (P <0.05) in the post-test; But the mean scores of Self-differentiation in the follow-up stage were not significant. According to the obtained results, reality therapy training based on choice theory can be used as an appropriate and effective method in couple therapy interventions and in premarital counseling.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • reality therapy
  • social role taking
  • self- differentiation.Choice Theory

مراجع

  1. Oosterhouse K., Riggs S.A., Kaminski P., Blumenthal H.. The executive subsystem in middle childhood: Adult mental health, marital satisfaction, and secure‐base parenting. Family Relations. 2020; 69: 166-179.
  2. Galinsky A.D., Ku G., Wang C.S.. Perspective-taking and self-other overlap: Fostering social bonds and facilitating social coordination. Group Processes & Intergroup Relatio, 2005; 2(8): 15
  3. Flavell H. John. Theory-of-Mind Development: Retrospect and Prospect, Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 2004; (3): 50.
  4. Gehlbach H.. A new perspective on perspective taking: A multidimensional approach to conceptualizing an aptitude. Educational Psychology Review, 2004;16(3): 207-234.
  5. Rogers C.R. The underlying theory: Drawn from experiences with individuals' groups. Counseling and Values, 1987; 32(1): 38-45.
  6. Olson, D.H. FACES IV and the Circumplex Model: Validation study. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 2011; 37(1): 64-80.
  7. Beck Aaron T.. A 60-Year Evolution of Cognitive Theory and Therapy. Perspectives on Psychological Science; 2019   https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691618804187
  8. Perner J., Lang B.. Development of theory of mind and executive control. Trends in cognitive sciences, 1999; 3(9): 337–344.
  9. Oswald P. The Effects of Cognitive and Affective Perspective Taking on Empathic Concern and Altruistic Helping. The Journal of Social Psychology, 1996; 136(5):613-23. doi: 10.1080/00224545
  10. Ross L., Ward A.. Naive realism: Implications for social conflict and misunderstanding. Working. Stanford Center on Conflict and Negotiation. Stanford, CA; 1995: 103-135
  11. Davis M., Oathout H.. Maintenance of satisfaction in romantic relationships: Empathy and relational competence. J Personality and Social Psychology, 1987; 53: 397-410. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.53.2.397
  12. Richardson D.R., Green L.R., Lago T.. The relationship between perspective taking and non-aggressive responding in the face of an attack. J Personality & Social Psychology, 1998; 66: 21 .
  13. Long E.. Perspective-taking differences between high- and low-adjustment marriages: Implications for those in intervention. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 2007; 21(3): 248-259.
  14. LeBlanc E., Gilin A., Calnan K., Solarz B.. Perspective Taking, Empathy, and Relational Conflict at Work: An Investigation Among Participants in a Workplace Conflict Resolution Program. Intl. Association for Conflict Management, IACM 25th Annual Conference; 2012.
  15. Bissonnette V.L., Rusbult C.E., Kilpatrick S.D.. Empathic accuracy and marital conflict resolution. In W. J. Ickes (Ed.) Empathic accuracy, 1997: 251-281.
  16. Mohagheghi H., Zoghi Paydar M., Yaqubi A., Yarmohammadi Vasel M., Mohammadzadeh S.. Development and validation of the Social Perspective Scale in Students.Bi-Quarterly J Social Cognition, 2016; 5 (1): 18-133. ‍]In Persian[.
  17. Bowen M.. Family therapy in clinical practice. Jason Aronson International Journal of Reality Therapy, 1978; 21(1): 7-12.
  18. Peleg O., Miller P., Yitzhak M.. Is separation anxiety in adolescents and parents related to parental differentiation of self?.  British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 2015; 43(4): 413-428.
  19. Yousefi N.,Azizi A.. Explain a model for predicting marital conflict based on differentiation and personality types. Journal of Counseling and Psychotherapy Culture, 2019; 9: 57-78. ]In Persian[.
  20. Karimi Y., Almasi S., Mohammadi R., Fazeli H.. The study of divorce contexts in divorced individuals: Phenomenological research. Quarterly J Clinical Psychology Studies, 2016; 7(25): 211-191. ‍]In Persian[.
  21. Haskins N.H., Appling B.. Relational‐Cultural Theory and Reality Therapy: A Culturally Responsive Integrative Framework. J Counseling & Development, 2017; 95(1): 87-99.
  22. Glasser W. Station of the mind: New direction for reality therapy. New York: William Glasser; 2008.
  23. Glasser W., Glasser C.. Eight lesson for happier marriage. New York: Harper Collins; 2008.
  24. Rahimi R., Hakmabadi M., Arefi M., Jozi P., Kalantar A. The effectiveness of group reality therapy based on selection theory in changing the attitude of patients treated with methadone maintenance. Social Health and Addiction Quarterly, 2016; 3(11): 165-155. ‍]In Persian[.
  25. Schilling Lewis. Consulting Theories. translated by Seyedeh Khadijeh Arian, Tehran: Etelaat; 2011.
  26. Bradley E.L. Choice theory and reality therapy: an overview. International Journal of Choice Theory and Reality Therapy, 2014; 1(1): 6-14
  27. Duba J.D., Graham M., Britzman M., Minatrea N. Introducing the ‘‘basic needs genogram’’ in reality therapy-based marriage and family counseling. International Journal of Reality Therapy, 2009; 2(3):15–19.
  28. Fthollah zadeh N., Mirsafifard L., Kazemi M., Saadati N., Navabi Nejad Sh. The effectiveness of marital life enrichment based on choice theory on the quality of marital relationships and intimacy of couples. Quarterly J Applied Psychology, 2017; 11(3): 353-372. ]In Persian[.
  29. Aghayosefi A., Fathiashtiyani A., Aliakbari M., Imanifar H.. The Study of Effectiveness Reality Therapy Approach Based on Choice Theory on Marital Conflict and Social Well-Being. Quarterly J Woman & Society, 2016; 7: 1-19. ‍]In Persian[.
  30. Shariatzadeh M., Tabrizi M., Ahqar Gh.. The effectiveness of group selection theory on increasing differentiation and intimacy of married students. Quarterly J Knowledge and Health, 2013; 8(3): 94-85. ‍]In Persian[.
  31. Darbay M. Reviews the effectiveness of teaching concepts theory reality therapy on increasing intimacy incompatible couples counseling centers. PhD dissertation. Tehran: Alom Behzisti university; 2008. [ In Persian].
  32. Drake J.R. Differentiation of Self-Inventory –Short Form: Creation & Initial Evidence of Construct Validity. PhD Dissertation, University of Missouri-Kansas City; 2011
  33. Fakhari N., Latifian M., Etemad J.. Psychometric Properties of the Differentiation Questionnaire in Iranian Students. Quarterly Journal of Educational Measurement, 2013; 15(5): 58-35. ‍]In Persian[.
  34. Amani A.. The effectiveness of group reality therapy on self-esteem and marital commitment of couples. Bi-Quarterly Journal of Counseling and Psychotherapy, 2015; 5(2): 23-2. ‍]In Persian[.
  35. Glasser W. Reality Therapy: A New Approach to Psychiatry. New York: HarperCollins Publication; 2010
  36. Skowron E.A., Frledlander M.L.. The differentiation of inventory: Development and initial validation. Journal of counseling psychology, 1998; 45(3): 235-246.
خانواده و بهداشت
دوره 12، شماره 3 - شماره پیاپی 34
مقالات
آذر 1401
صفحه 36-49

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 03 آذر 1400
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 23 اسفند 1400
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 22 فروردین 1401
  • تاریخ اولین انتشار: 01 آذر 1401

اشتراک گذاری

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار