پیش‌بینی حل تعارض در افراد متأهل بر اساس حمایت اجتماعی ادراک‌شده و رضامندی زناشویی با میانجیگری‌ سرمایه‌های روان‌شناختی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دکترا روان‌شناسی عمومی، واحد رودهن، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، رودهن، ایران،

2 نویسنده مسئول، دانشیار گروه روان‌شناسی، واحد رودهن، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، رودهن، ایران، mojtabaie@riau.ac.ir،

3 دانشیار گروه روان‌شناسی، واحد رودهن، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، رودهن، ایران،

چکیده

مقدمه: زوجین بر اساس آموخته‌ها، تجارب و شناخت‌های زیربنایی خود، دارای سبک‌های خاصی از حل تعارض هستند. امروزه رضایت زناشویی در زندگی مشترک، به یکی از اصلی‌ترین دغدغه های زوجین تبدیل شده است؛ بنابراین هدف پژوهش حاضر تعیین رابطه بین رضایت زناشویی، حمایت اجتماعی ادراک‌شده و حل تعارض در زوجین بر اساس نقش میانجیگر‌ سرمایه‌های روان‌شناختی بود.
روش پژوهش: روش پژوهش توصیفی از نوع همبستگی و جامعۀ آماری پژوهش حاضر، تمام افراد متأهل دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحدهای تهران شمال، تهران جنوب، تهران مرکز، تهران غرب، تهران شرق و علوم تحقیقات در سال 1397 بود. به روش نمونه‌گیری خوشه‌ای چندمرحله‌ای 270 نفر انتخاب شدند. ابزار پژوهش مقیاس رضامندی زناشویی افروز (1387)؛ مقیاس چندوجهی حمایت اجتماعی ادراک‌شده زیمت و همکاران (1988)؛ پرسشنامۀ سرمایۀ روان‌شناختی لوتانز و همکاران (2007) و پرسشنامه حل تعارض مک‌کللان (1997) بود.
یافته‌ها: نتایج نشان داد ضریب مسیر مستقیم بین سرمایۀ روان‌شناختی و حل تعارض مثبت و در سطح 01/0 معنادار بود. ضریب مسیر غیرمستقیم بین رضایت زناشویی و حل تعارض با میانجیگری سرمایه‌های روان‌شناختی مثبت بود. ضریب مسیر غیرمستقیم بین حمایت اجتماعی ادراک‌شده و حل تعارض با میانجیگری سرمایه‌های روان‌شناختی مثبت بود.
نتیجه‌گیری: از نتایج پژوهش حاضر به‌طورکلی می‌توان چنین نتیجه گرفت که زوجین رضامند از میزان بالای سرمایۀ اجتماعی برخوردارند که با فراهم آوردن احساس امنیت و نظام اخلاقی، ارزشی و هنجاری مشترک، و رضامندی زناشویی را افزایش میدهد.و بدین‌صورت سرمایۀ روان‌شناختی زوجین را ارتقا میدهد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

The effectiveness of a combination of marital relationship enrichment training and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy on depression, anxiety and emotional divorce of women with addicted spouses

نویسندگان [English]

  • Leila TehraniAzad 1
  • Mina Mojtabaie 2
  • Khadijeh Abolmaalialhoseimi 3
1 PhD in General Psychology, Roudehen Branch, Islamic Azad University, Roudehen, Iran,
2 Corresponding Author, Associate Professor, Department of Psychology, Roudehen Branch, Islamic Azad University, Roudehen, Iran, mojtabaie@riau.ac.ir
3 Associate Professor, Department of Psychology, Roudehen Branch, Islamic Azad University, Roudehen, Iran,
چکیده [English]

Introduction: Every family should be a brick of the walls of a society and the main center for preserving traditions and customs, as well as respected and precious values, a strong institution for lasting social relations among relatives, the source of expression and expression of emotion. To be considered the center of the most intimate relationships between people and the cultivation of thought, mind, creativity and the promotion of the soul, Therefore, this study was conducted to determine the effectiveness of a combination of training on enrichment of marital relationships and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy on depression, anxiety and emotional divorce of women with addicted spouses.
Method: The research method was quasi-experimental pre-test-post-test with a control group. The statistical population consisted of all women with addicted spouses who referred to addiction treatment clinics and treatment camps for addiction treatment and relevant non-governmental organizations in Isfahan in 1398. Based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the sample was sampled in Available selection And answered questionnaires on anxiety, depression, and emotional divorce. Thus, 30 women with addicted spouses were randomly selected and randomly assigned to the experimental and control groups (15 in each group). The subjects in the experimental group underwent a combined training of enrichment of marital relationships and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for 8 sessions of 90 minutes, but the control group did not receive any intervention. Data were analyzed at two levels of descriptive (mean and standard deviation) and inferential level (multivariate analysis of covariance).
Results: The results showed a significant decrease in the mean of depression (p = 0.320), (F = 1.024), anxiety (p = 0.638), (F = 0.226) and emotional divorce (p = 0.540). (F = 6.789), women with addicted spouses were in the experimental group compared to the control group (p≤0.01).
Conclusion: According to the research findings, combined education of enrichment of marital relations and cognitive therapy based on mindfulness is a method based on common sense and emotional conflict that can be used to reduce the damage caused by depression, anxiety and emotional divorce in women. Used by an addicted spouse.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Anxiety" Cognitive Therapy" Depression" Emotional Divorce" Integrated Education" Enrichment" Marital Relationships
1.Gonczarowski Y A, Nisan N, OstrovskyR Rosenbaum W.. A stable marriage requires communication. Games and Economic Behavior. 2019; 118(2): 626-647.
2.Aftab R, Karbalaee Mohammad Meigouni A. Taghiloo S.. The mediating role of emotion regulation strategies in relationship between borderline personality and conjugal violence. Quarterly of Applied Psychology.2015; 8(32): 7-27.
3.Özgüç S.  Tanrıverdi D.. Relations between depression level and conflict resolution styles, marital adjustments of patients with major depression and their spouses. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 2018; 32(3): 337-342.
4.Fathi E, Esmaeili M. Farahbakhsh K.  Daneshpour M.. Areas of conflict and strategies of resolving conflicts in satisfied couples. Counseling Culture and Psychotherapy.2016; 6(24): 29-54.
5.Mousavi S F.,  Dehshiri G.. The role of discrepancy between expectations and reality of marital relationship in marital satisfaction of married people in Tehran. Women's Studies Sociological and Psychological.2015; 13(2): 93-110.
6.Yaghoobi A., Mohammadzadeh S.. Construction and validation of the educational protocol of social perspective-taking and analyzes of its efficacy on couple’s conflict resolutions styles. Counseling Culture and Psychotherapy.2017; 28(2): 103-131.
7.Lee WS., McKinnish T.. Locus of control and marital satisfaction: Couple perspectives using Australian data. Journal of Economic Psychology.2019; 74(2): 102-205.
8.Azadian O.,  Fathi, S.. The study of homogamy among couples in Tehran and its impact on marital satisfaction. Sociology of Women. Journal of Woman and Society.2017; 7(2): 85-104.
9.Newman A, Nielsen I., Smyth R., Hirst G.. Mediating Role of Psychological Capital in the Relationship between Social Support and Wellbeing of Refugees. International Migration.2018; 56(2): 117-132.
10.Howard M C.. The empirical distinction of core self-evaluations and psychological capital and the identification of negative core self-evaluations and negative psychological capital. Personality and Individual Differences.2017; 114(4): 108-118.
11.Luthans F., Avey J B., Patera J L.. Experimental analysis of a web-based training intervention to develop positive psychological capital. Academy of Management Learning & Education.2008; 7(2): 209-221.
12.Hobfoll S. E.. Social and Psychological Resources and Adaptation. Review of General Psychology.2002; 6(4): 307-324.
13.Youssef CM., Luthans F.. Positive Organizational Behavior in the Workplace: The Impact of Hope, Optimism, and Resilience. Journal of Management.2007; 33(5): 774-800.
14.Nabovi S A., Shahriyari M.. The effect of stress and social support in the family motivation work-family conflict. Iranian Journal of Sociology.2012; 13(1-2): 31-57.
15.Cohen S., Wills T A.. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis,  Psychological Bulletin.1985; 98(2):310-357. 
16.Hosseini A., Zahrakar K., Davarnia R., Shakarami M.. Prediction of Vulnerability to Stress Based on Social Support, Resiliency, Coping Strategies and Personality Traits among University Students. Research in Cognitive and Behavioral Sciences, 2016; 6(2): 27-42.
17.Cohen S.. Social relationships and health. American Psychologist.2004; 59(3): 676-684.
18.Kakabararee K., Ezati N.. The Pattern of Structural Relations between Social Problem Solving, Perception of the Quality of Social Relationships, and Emotional Well-being. Thoughts and Behavior in Clinical Psychology.2017; 12(43): 7-16.
19.Tong E. M. W.. Hope and Hopelessness. In J. D. Wright (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (Second Edition). Elsevier; 2015.pp. 197-201.
20.Omidian M., Abdullahi Tezerjan Z., Rahimi M.. The relationship between perceived social support and cognitive engagement with mediation of self-efficacy. Journal of Educational Psychology Studies.2017;14(28): 1-20.
21.Poursardar N., Poursardar F., Panahandeh A., Sangari A., Abdi Zarrin S.. Effect of Optimism on Mental Health and Life Satisfaction: A Psychological Model of Well-being. Hakim Health Systems Research Journal.2013; 16(1):42-49.
22.Sahraee Darian E., Karbalaee Mohammad Meigouni A.. Prediction of pain self-efficacy in patients with liver transplant base on childhood trauma and resilience. Quarterly of Family and Health.2017; 7(1):26-44.
23.Golparvar M., Ghasemi M., Mosahebi M R.. The role model of the components of psychological capital in life satisfaction and marital satisfaction in the wives of the martyrs of Shahrekord. Women's Studies Sociological and Psychological.2014; 12(1): 119-140.
24.Zamani N., Babapour J., Sabori H.. Structural relationship between conflict resolution strategies dimensions and social well-being of Students by considering the moderating effects of psychological capital. Journal of Educational Psychology Studies.2018 ;15(30): 135-166.
25.Zimet G D., Dahlen N W., Zimet S G.. The Multidimensional scale of perceived social support. Journal of personality assessment.1988; 52(3): 30-41.
26.Nasiri F., Abdolmaleki S. E. Explaining the Relationship between Perceived Social Support and Quality of Life, Perceived Stress Mediator Role in Female-Headed Households in Sanandaj. Journal of Applied Sociology.2017; 27(4): 99-116.
27.Mohebbi M., Ghasemzadeh S., Farzad V.. Review on practicality reliability, validity and normalization of couple's satisfaction scale among married women teachers in Tehran city. Journal of Applied Psychology Research.2017; 7(4): 163-179.
28.Luthans F., Avolio B J, Avey J.. B, Norman S M.. Positive psychological capital: measurement and relationship with performance and satisfaction. Personnel Psychology.2007; 60(3): 541-572.
29.Sarami Foroushani, Akhoondi GH., Alipour N., Arab Sheibani, Hadijeh. Validation and study of the factor structure of the psychological capital questionnaire in the experts of Iran Khodro Diesel Company. Psychological Studies.2014; 10 (3): 109-95.
30.Henning, M. Evaluation of the Conflict Resolution Questionnaire. A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the degree of Master of Business;2003
31.Akrami Z., Ahmadvand M. A. Explain the mediating role of conflict resolution styles in the relationship between attachment styles and marital satisfaction. 5th National Conference and First International Conference on Social Sciences and Psychology of Iran;2018
32.Gholizadeh A., Esmaeelian Ardestani, Z.. The Effect of Social Capital Components on Marital Satisfaction of Married Students. Knowledge & Research in Applied Psychology.2017; 15(56): 37-46.
33.Bryant F. B., Harrison P. R. Chapter 3 - Measures of Hope and Optimism: Assessing Positive Expectations of the Future. In G. J. Boyle, D. H. Saklofske, & G. Matthews (Eds.), Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Constructs. Academic Press;2015. pp. 47-73.
34.Prince-Embury S. Saklofske D H.. Resilience in Children, Adolescents, and Adults: Translating Research into Practice. New York: Springer Science, Business Media;2013.
35.Sagone E,  De Caroli M.. A Correlational Study on Dispositional Resilience, Psychological Wellbeing, and Coping Strategies in University Students. American Journal of Educational Research.2014; 2(7): 463-471.
36.Lau S, Kubiak T., Burchert S., Goering M., Hiemisch A.. Disentangling the effects of optimism and attributions on feelings of success. Personality and Individual Differences.2014;56(3): 78-82.
37.Masten, A.S. Ordinary magic. Resilience processes in development. American Psychology.2014; 56(1): 227-238.
38.Manyena B., Machingura F., O'Keefe P.. Disaster Resilience Integrated Framework for Transformation (DRIFT): A new approach to theorizing and operationalizing resilience. World Development.2019; 123(4): 104587.
39.Renshaw, K. D., Blais, R. K., Smith, T. W.. Components of negative affectivity and marital satisfaction: The importance of actor and partner anger. Research in Personality.2010; 44(3): 328-334.
40.Sheikh Zeineddin H., Farrokhi N. A., Abbaspoor Azar Z.. Mediating role of psychological capital in the relationship between personality features with marital adjustment in students. Quarterly of Applied Psychology.2018; 12(47):445-468.