نقش میانجی تاب آوری در تبیین مدل شادکامی بر اساس هوش معنوی و کیفیت روابط بین فردی در دانشجویان

نویسندگان

1 گروه روانشناسی عمومی، واحد تهران مرکزی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران .narsis_salimi@yahoo.com,

2 گروه روانشناسی بالینی، واحد تهران مرکزی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران. (نویسنده مسئول) emamipursd@yahoo.com,

3 گروه روانشناسی عمومی، واحد تهران مرکزی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران ایران.Vfarzad@yahoo.com,

4 گروه روانشناسی عمومی، واحد تهران مرکزی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران .royakentezar@yahoo.com،

چکیده

مقدمه : در طول دهه گذشته تحقیقات در زمینه روانشناسی مثبت نگر در تلاش برای پاسخ به سوال بشر در مورد کامیابی به ویژه تجربه شادی است. در روانشناسی مثبت فرض بر این است که توانایی‏هایی در انسان وجود دارند مانند شجاعت، آینده‏نگری، خوش‏بینی، ایمان، امید و پشتکار که به عنوان مانعی علیه بیماریهای روانی عمل می‏کنند. پژوهش حاضر با هدف تعیین نقش میانجی تاب آوری در تبیین مدل شادکامی بر اساس هوش معنوی و کیفیت روابط بین فردی در دانشجویان انجام گرفت.
روش پژوهش: روش پژوهش مقطعی از نوع همبستگی است. جامعه آماری شامل دانشجویان دختر و پسر مجرد در مقطع کارشناسی (18-25 سال) دانشگاه‏های ‏آزاد اسلامی  شهر تهران در نیمسال اول سال تحصیلی 1398 بودند. حجم  نمونه 458  نفر (231 دختر، 227 پسر) که به روش نمونه گیری تصادفی چند مرحله‏ای ‏انتخاب شدند. ابزارهای پژوهش عبارت بودند از: شادکامی آکسفورد، هوش معنوی، کیفیت روابط بین فردی و تاب آوری. به منظور تجزیه‌وتحلیل داده‌ها از نرم‌افزار SPSS-V21 و AMOS استفاده گردید همچنین داده­ها با استفاده از روش تحلیل مسیر مورد تحلیل قرار گرفت.
یافته ها: نتایج نشان دادکه هوش معنوی بر شادکامی دانشجویان اثر مستقیم دارد. هوش معنوی با میانجی­گری تاب­آوری بر شادکامی اثر غیرمستقیم دارد. نتایج پژوهش نشان داد که کیفیت روابط بین فردی بر روی شادکامی دانشجویان اثر مستقیم و معنی­داری دارد. همچنین نتایج پژوهش نشان می‏دهد که مقدار اثر غیرمستقیم کیفیت رابطه از طریق متغیر واسطه‏ای ‏تاب آوری بر روی شادکامی معنی دار هست.
نتیجه گیری: بنابراین توجه به متغیرهای مذکور در طراحی درمان‌های مناسب‌تر به پژوهشگران و درمانگران یاری می‌رساند.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

The Mediating Role of Resilience in Explaining the Happiness Model Based on Spiritual Intelligence and the Quality of Interpersonal Relationships in Students

نویسندگان [English]

  • Narges Saliminia 1
  • Susan Emamipoor 2
  • Valioallah Farzad 3
  • Roya Koochakentezar 4
1 Ph. D Student, Department of General Psychology, Central Tehran Branch Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran. narsis_salimi@yahoo.com
2 Corresponding author, Faculty member, Department of Clinical Psychology, Central Tehran, Branch Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran. emamipursd@yahoo.com
3 Faculty member, Department of General Psychology, Central Tehran, Branch Islamic Azad University Tehran, Iran. Vfarzad@yahoo.com
4 Faculty member, Department of General Psychology, Central TehranBranch Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran royakentezar@yahoo.com
چکیده [English]

Introduction: Over the past decade, research into positive psychology has sought to answer the human question of success, especially the experience of happiness. In positive psychology, it is assumed that there are abilities in human beings such as courage, foresight, optimism, faith, hope and perseverance that act as a barrier against mental illness. The aim of this study was to determining the mediating role of resilience in explaining the happiness model based on spiritual intelligence and the quality of interpersonal relationships in students.
Methods: The research method is cross-sectional correlation. The statistical population included undergraduate male and female students (18-25 years old) of Islamic Azad Universities of Tehran in the first semester of the 1398 academic year. The sample size was 458 people (231 girls, 227 boys) who were selected by multi-stage random sampling. The research tools were: Oxford Happiness, Spiritual Intelligence, Quality of Interpersonal Relationships (Pierce et al 1991) and Resilience.  In order to analyze the data, SPSS-V21 and AMOS software were used and the data were analyzed using path analysis method.
Results: The results showed that spiritual intelligence has a direct effect on students' happiness. Spiritual intelligence has an indirect effect on happiness through mediation. The quality of the relationship has a direct and significant effect on students' happiness. The results also show that the value of the indirect effect of relationship quality through intermediate resilience variable on happiness is significant.
Conclusion: Therefore, attention to these variables in the design of appropriate therapies helps researchers and therapists.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Happiness" Quality of Interpersonal Relationships" Resilience" Spiritual Intelligence
  1. Aziz R., Mustaffa S., Samah NA., Yusof R.. Personality and happiness among academicians in Malaysia. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2014 Feb 21;116:4209-12.
  2. Seligman ME., Steen TA., Park N., Peterson C.. Positive psychology progress: empirical validation of interventions. American psychologist. 2005 Jul;60(5):410.
  3. Diener E.. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ’s) About Subjective Well-Being (Happiness and Life Satisfaction): a Primer for Reporters and Newcomers. Recuperado de http://www. psych. uiuc. edu/~ ediener/faq. html, em. 2007;23.
  4. Carr A.. Positive Psychology, The science of Happiness and human Strengths. Brunner–routledge. Tailor & francis group.2004.
  5. Ryan RM., Deci EL.. On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual review of psychology. 2001 Feb;52(1):141-66.
  6. Argyle M., Martin M., Crossland J.. Happiness as a function of personality and social encounters. Recent advances in social psychology: An international perspective. 1989:189-203.
  7. Weisenberg M., Raz T., Hener T.. The influence of film-induced mood on pain perception. Pain. 1998 Jun 1;76(3):365-75.
  8. Siqhali H.. The effect of laughter on the health of body and soul. Etemad newspaper.2005. (Persian)
  9. Adam Karduz FF., Saricam H.. The Relationships between Positivity, Forgiveness, Happiness, and Revenge. Romanian Journal for Multidimensional Education/Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala. 2018 Dec 1;10(4).
  10. Seligman E.P.. Positive Psychology: Fundamental assumption. American Psychologist. 2002; 1(16): 126-136.
  11. Miller MA.. Culture, spirituality, and women's health. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, & Neonatal Nursing. 1995 Mar;24(3):257-64.
  12. Khorami Markani A, Yaghmaei F , Khodayari Fard M, Alavi Majd  Investigating the Relationship between Spiritual Health and Religiosity of Oncology Nurses and Their Attitudes Towards Performing Spiritual Care Based on Newman Systems Model: Designing and Testing the Model, PhD Thesis in Nursing, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences and Health Services, 2011.(Persian)
  13. Edwards AC.. COMMENTARY: Response to the Spiritual Intelligence Debate: Are Some Conceptual Distinctions Needed Here? The international journal for the psychology of religion. 2003 Jan 1;13(1):49-52.
  14. Emmons RA.. Is spirituality an intelligence? Motivation, cognition, and the psychology of ultimate concern. The International Journal for the psychology of Religion. 2000 Jan 1;10(1):3-26.
  15. Ritzman TA.. Forgiveness: Its role in therapy. Medical Hypnoanalysis Journal. 1987 Mar.
  16. Bagheri , Akbarizadeh F., Hatami H.R.. The relationship between spiritual intelligence and happiness and demographic variables in nurses of Fatemeh Alzahra and Bint Al-Huda hospitals in Bushehr, Southern Medicine.2011; 14(4): 256-263. (Persian)
  17. Lazarus AA.. Multimodal behavior therapy. John Wiley & Sons Inc; 2008.
  18. Sarukhani . Sociology of Communication, Tehran: Information. 1390. (Persian)
  19. Reich TC., Hershcovis MS.. Interpersonal relationships at work.2011.
  20. Fergus P.. Psychology of social interaction. Translated by Khashayar Beigi and Mehrdad Firooz Bakht. Tehran: Abjad Publishing. 2000. (Persian)
  21. McAuley E., Blissmer B., Marquez DX., Jerome GJ., Kramer AF., Katula J.. Social relations, physical activity, and well-being in older adults. Preventive medicine. 2000 Nov 1;31(5):608-17.
  22. Diener, E. D. Lucas, R.E.. The Evolving Concept of Subjective Well– Being: The Multifaceted Nature of Happiness. Advances in Cell Aging and Gerontology,2003; 5: 187-219
  23. Kalantari , Ismaili. The pattern of change in psychology. Bi-Quarterly Journal of Transformation Studies in Humanities. 2015; 2 (4): 101-123. (Persian)
  24. Connor KM., Davidson JR.. Development of a new resilience scale: The Connor‐Davidson resilience scale (CD‐RISC). Depression and anxiety. 2003 Sep;18(2):76-82.
  25. Arce E., Simmons AW., Winkielman P., Stein MB., Hitckock C.. Paulus MP.. Association between individual differences in self-reported emotional resilience and the affective perception of neutral faces. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2008;25:210-22.
  26. Khormai F., Akbari A., Sadri M., Niroumand H.. Predicting happiness based on the dimensions of family communication patterns mediated by resilience in students, Educational Psychology Studies. 2015; 11 (21): 84-64. (Persian)
  27. Nemati S., Maralani FM.. The relationship between life satisfaction and happiness: The mediating role of Resilience. International Journal of Psychological Studies. 2016;8(3):194-201. (Persian)
  28. Stevens JP.. Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. Routledge; 2012 Nov 12.
  29. Argyle M.. The psychology of happiness. Routledge; 2013 Oct 23.
  30. Jowkar B., Rahimi M.. Study of the Effect of Family Communication Patterns on Happiness in a Group of High School Students in Shiraz. IJPCP. 2008; 13 (4) :376-384. (Persian)
  31. Badie A., Savari E., Bagheri Dashtbozorg N., Latifiazadegan V.. Development and reliability and validity of the spiritual intelligence scale. InNational Psychology Conference Payamnour University, Tabriz 2010. (Persian)
  32. Pierce GR., Sarason IG., Sarason BR. Quality of Relationships Inventory (QRI) 1991.
  33. Mohammadi Massoud. Investigating the Factors Affecting Resilience in People at Risk of Substance Abuse, PhD Thesis, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran.2006. (Persian)
  34. Lotfi Kashani F.. The effect of group counseling based on cognitive behavioral approach in reducing dysfunctional attitudes. Journal of Thought and Behavior.2000; 2(8):47-56. (Persian)
  35. Meyers, D.. The friends, funds, and faith of happy people. American psychology. 2001;55(1): 56- 67.
  36. Peterson C. The future of optimism. American psychologist. 2000 Jan;55(1):44.
  37. Yaqubi A.. The Relationship between Spiritual Intelligence and Mental Health of Students of Bu Ali University, Proceedings of the Fourth National Seminar on Student Mental Health.2008. (Persian)
  38. Lyubomirsky S., Sheldon KM., Schkade D.. Pursuing happiness: The architecture of sustainable change. Review of general psychology. 2005 Jun;9(2):111-31.
  39. Ellison CG.. Religious involvement and subjective well-being. Journal of health and social behavior. 1991 Mar 1:80-99.
  40. Bahadori Khosroshahi J., Babapour Khairuddin J., Poursharifi H.. The Relationship between Compatibility and Source of Control with Happiness in Students, Psychological Research. 2015; 18 (2), 127-114. (Persian)
  41. Shahsavar . Ghaffari M., Makhtumnejad R.. The mediating role of psychological hard work and perceived social support in the relationship between spiritual intelligence and happiness in elderly women, Journal of Gerontology. 2019; 2 (4): 11-21. (Persian)
  42. Mahmood K., Ghaffar A.. The relationship between resilience, psychological distress and subjective well-being among dengue fever survivors. Global J HumanSoc Sci Res. 2014;14(10):13-20. (Persian)
  43. Kobasa SC., Puccetti MC.. Personality and social resources in stress resistance. Journal of personality and social psychology. 1983 Oct;45(4):839.