بررسی رابطه هوش موفق و همدلی با رشد اجتماعی کودکان پیش‌دبستانی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری، روانشناسی عمومی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران. Nasireh.moghadam@gmail.com

2 استادیار، گروه روانشناسی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران. (نویسنده مسئول) (ایمیل: rrghorban@gmail.com)

3 استادیار، گروه روانشناسی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران. Dr.bitanasrolahi@gmail.com

4 دانشیار، گروه روانشناسی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران.

چکیده

مقدمه: هوش موفق و همدلی، از مؤلفه‌های مهم تربیت کودک هستند که می‌توانند به رشد اجتماعی کودکان کمک کنند. مطالعه حاضر با هدف بررسی رابطه هوش موفق و همدلی با رشد اجتماعی کودکان پیش‌دبستانی انجام شد. روش‌: روش‌ پژوهش در ایم مطالعه توصیفی از نوع همبستگی بود.
روش پژوهش: جامعه‌آماری پژوهش شامل کودکان پیش‌دبستانی شهر تهران سال 1398 بود که تعداد 370 کودک به روش نمونه‌گیری خوشه‌ای چندمرحله‌ای انتخاب شدند. به منظور گردآوری‌ داده‌ها از مقیاس رشد اجتماعی واینلند (1953)، پرسشنامه همدلی بریانت و پرسشنامه هوش موفق استفاده شد، به منظور تجزیه و تحلیل داده‌ها به کار گرفته شد. یافته‌ها: همدلی تأثیر مستقیمی بر رشد اجتماعی داشت (26/0=β؛ 001/0>P) و هوش موفق تأثیر غیرمستقیم بر رشد اجتماعی کودکان داشت (13/0=β؛ 02/0>P) ،داده‌ها با آزمون‌های آماری ضریب همبستگی پیرسون و رگرسیون چندگانه مورد تجزیه و تحلیل قرار گرفت.
یافته ها:نتایج تحلیل نشان داد که بین هوش موفق و رشد اجتماعی دانش‌آموزان، همبستگی مستقیم معنی‌دار وجود داشت همچنین بین همدلی و رشد اجتماعی، همبستگی معنی دار نبود. در نهایت نتایج تحلیل رگرسیون به منظور تبیین سهم هر یک از متغیرهای هوش موفق، همدلی به تفکیک در پیش‌بینی رشد اجتماعی نشان داد که از بین دو متغیر مورد مطالعه، متغیر هوش موفق بیشترین سهم را در تبیین رشد اجتماعی دانش‌آموزان داشت.
نتیجه‌گیری: متغیرهای همدلی و هوش موفق با رشد اجتماعی کودکان پیش‌دبستانی رابطه مثبتی با هم دارند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Investigating the relationship between successful intelligence and empathy with social development of preschool children

نویسندگان [English]

  • Nasireh Moghadamfar 1
  • Reza Ghorbanjahromi 2
  • Bita Nasrollahi 3
  • Fariborz Bagheri 4
1 PhD Student, Department of Psychology, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran. , Nasireh.moghadam@gmail.com
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran. 0000-0002-0295-5295 (Corresponding Author) (E-mail: rrghorban@gmail.com)
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran. , Dr.bitanasrolahi@gmail.com
4 Associate Professor, Department of Psychology, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.bagheri@srbiau.ac.ir
چکیده [English]

Introduction: Successful intelligence and empathy are important components of child rearing that can help children's social development. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between successful intelligence and empathy with social development of preschool children.
Methods: The design of the present study was descriptive-correlational. The statistical population of the study included preschool children in Tehran in 1398 that 370 children were selected by multi-stage cluster sampling. In order to collect data, the Vineland Social Growth Scale (1953), the Bryant Empathy Questionnaire and the Successful Intelligence Questionnaire, which have acceptable validity and reliability, were used. Structural equation modeling was used to analyze the data. Findings: The empathy had a direct impact on social development (Β =0.26; P<0.001) and intelligence had an indirect impact on social development of children (Β = 0.13; P <0.02), Data were analyzed by Pearson correlation coefficient and multiple regression tests.
Results: The results of the analysis showed that there was a significant direct correlation between successful intelligence and students' social development and also a significant correlation between empathy and social development. Finally, the results of regression analysis to explain the contribution of each of the variables of successful intelligence, empathy separately in predicting social growth showed that among the two variables studied, the variable of successful intelligence had the largest share in explaining the social development of students.
Conclusion: Successful empathy and intelligence variables have a positive relationship with social development of preschool children.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Empathy" Social Development" Preschool Children" Successful intelligence

مراجع

  1. Sari LE. The Challenges of Parental Involvement in Early Childhood Inclusion. JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Inklusi). 2020;3(2):92-101.
  2. Maleki M., Chehrzad MM., Kazemnezhad Leyli E, Mardani A, Vaismoradi M. Social Skills in Preschool Children from Teachers’ Perspectives. children. 2019;6(5):64.
  3. Plagerson S.. Integrating mental health and social development in theory and practice. Health policy and planning. 2015;30(2):163-70.
  4. Parke RD., Roisman GI., Rose AJ.. Social development: John Wiley & Sons; 2019.
  5. Zellweger TM., Chrisman JJ., Chua JH., Steier LP.. Social structures, social relationships, and family firms. Sage Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA; 2019.
  6. Besharat MA.. Psychometric properties of Farsi version of the Emotional Intelligence Scale-41 (FEIS-41). Personality and individual differences. 2007;43(5):991-1000.
  7. Buruck G., Wendsche J., Melzer M., Strobel A., Dörfel D.. Acute psychosocial stress and emotion regulation skills modulate empathic reactions to pain in others. Frontiers in psychology. 2014;5:517.
  8. Eisenberg N., Fabes R.. Prosocial development. Handbook of child psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 701–778). New York: Wiley and Sons; 1998.
  9. Vossen HG., Piotrowski J.T., Valkenburg PM.. Development of the adolescent measure of empathy and sympathy (AMES). Personality and Individual Differences. 2015;74:66-71.
  10. Moghani MM., Abbasi F., Amani O.. The cognitive brain functions in adolescent survivor of lymphoblastic leukemia. 2018.
  11. Inghilleri P.. Phenomenology of Positive Change: Social Growth. Enabling Positive Change: Sciendo Migration; 2015: 6-17.
  12. MacDonald HZ., Price JL.. The role of emotion regulation in the relationship between empathy and internalizing symptoms in college students. Mental Health & Prevention. 2019;13:43-9.
  13. Sullivan GM., Artino Jr AR.. Analyzing and interpreting data from Likert-type scales. Journal of graduate medical education. 2013;5(4):541-2.
  14. Jolliffe D., Farrington DP.. Development and validation of the Basic Empathy Scale. Journal of adolescence. 2006;29(4):589-611.
  15. Du K., Buchanan M., Hayhurst JG., Ruffman T.. Parent talk about the wellbeing of others in disciplinary situations relates to younger children's empathy. New Zealand Journal of Psychology (Online). 2019;48(1):106-13.
  16. Spinrad TL., Gal DE.. Fostering prosocial behavior and empathy in young children. Current opinion in psychology. 2018;20:40-4.
  17. Raine A., Chen FR.. The cognitive, affective, and somatic empathy scales (CASES) for children. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology. 2018;47(1):24-37.
  18. Peets K., Pöyhönen V., Juvonen J., Salmivalli C.. Classroom norms of bullying alter the degree to which children defend in response to their affective empathy and power. Developmental psychology. 2015;51(7):913.
  19. Van Noorden TH., Haselager GJ., Cillessen AH., Bukowski WM. Empathy and involvement in bullying in children and adolescents: A systematic review. Journal of youth and adolescence. 2015;44(3):637-57.
  20. Stanley S., Bhuvaneswari GM.. Reflective ability, empathy, and emotional intelligence in undergraduate social work students: A cross-sectional study from India. Social Work Education. 2016;35(5):560-75.
  21. Sternberg RJ., Grigorenko EL.. Successful Intelligence in the Classroom (Retraction of Vol 43, Pg 274, 2010). ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD 2-4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK …; 2019.
  22. Lira LAN., Castillo PFN., Marrufo HRM., Melgar A. Mental maps as a strategy in the development of successful intelligence in high school students. 2019.
  23. Mintoub MK., Ali FT.. The strategy effect of successful intelligence in the student's achievement of the third grade of the college of education curriculum and teaching methods. Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development. 2018;9(10):736-9.
  24. Kaufman JC., Kaufman SB., Plucker JA.. Contemporary theories of intelligence. The Oxford handbook of cognitive psychology. 2013:811-22.
  25. Sternberg RJ.. Construct validation of a triangular love scale. European Journal of Social Psychology. 1997;27(3):313-35.
  26. Piqueras JA., Mateu-Martínez O., Cejudo J., Pérez-González J-C. Pathways into psychosocial adjustment in children: modeling the effects of trait emotional intelligence, social-emotional problems, and gender. Frontiers in psychology. 2019;10:507.
  27. Hirn SL., Thomas J., Zoelch C.. The role of empathy in the development of social competence: a study of German school leavers. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth. 2019;24(4):395-407.
  28. Berger R.. Stress, trauma, and posttraumatic growth: Social context, environment, and identities: Routledge; 2015.
  29. Hadarics M., Kende A.. Moral foundations of positive and negative intergroup behavior: Moral exclusion fills the gap. International Journal of Intercultural Relations. 2018;64:67-76.
  30. Gordon M.. Roots of empathy: Responsive parenting, caring societies. The Keio journal of medicine. 2003;52(4):236-43.
  31. Barzegar BK.. Influence of teaching empathy on aggression and social adjustment of girl students. Influence of Teaching Empathy on Aggression and Social adjustment of Girl Students. 2015;3(5):77-96.
  32. Hooman H.. Understanding the scientific method in the behavioral sciences. Tehran: Samt. 2007.
  33. Bryant BK.. An index of empathy for children and adolescents. Child development. 1982:413-25.
  34. arefi M LM.. Investigating the role of empathy and Machiavellian beliefs in social adequacy and inadequacy of students aged nine to twelve. Learning and Instruction. 2011;2011(1):14-21.
  35. Eagly AH., Beall AE., Sternberg RJ.. The psychology of gender: Guilford Press; 2005.
  36. Nasiri E., Tabari R., Salami-Kohan K., Kazem-Nezhad-Leili E. A study on the level of innovation and its related factors in critical care nurses employed in intensive care units. Journal of clinical nursing and midwifery. 2013;2.
  37. Pedrini D., Pedrini B.C.. Vineland Social Maturity Scale Profile. 1973.
  38. Moghtaderi N., Refahi Z.. The effectiveness of life values training (Happiness, Peace, Respect, Responsibility, Cooperation, Tolerance) to childs on their social growth and them parents self-efficacy. Research In Curriculum Planning. 2011;8:40-7.
  39. Langeveld JH., Gundersen KK., Svartdal F.. Social competence as a mediating factor in reduction of behavioral problems. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research. 2012;56(4):381-99.

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 13 بهمن 1399
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 27 مرداد 1400
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 04 خرداد 1400

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار