بررسی رابطه بین تصویربدنی، بدریخت انگاری و عدم تحمل بلاتکلیفی باتنظیم هیجانی دختران نوجوان

نویسندگان

1 کارشناسی ارشد مشاوره خانواده، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد تهران شمال، تهران، ایران.

2 دانشیار گروه روانشناسی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد تنکابن، تنکابن، ایران

چکیده

مقدمه:  اختلال بدریخت انگاری بدن یک بیماری غیرفعال است که شیوع بالایی در سراسر جهان دارد. پژوهش حاضر به بررسی رابطه بین تصویربدنی، بدریخت انگاری و عدم تحمل بلاتکلیفی باتنظیم هیجانی دختران نوجوان بود.
روش پژوهش: روش تحقیق این پژوهش ازنوع همبستگی بود و جامعه پژوهش کلیه دانش آموزان دختر دبیرستانی منطقه 5 تهران  بود که تعداد 150 نفر از دانش آموزان جهت انجام پژوهش انتخاب گردیدند. ابزارهای پژوهش شامل مقیاس عدم تحمل بلاتکلیفی(IUS) فریستون و همکاران و همکاران، مقیاس شکل بدن 34 سؤالی و پرسشنامه نگرش فرد در مورد تصویر بدنی خود بود. روش آماری پژوهش شامل آزمونهای پارامتریک آزمون ضریب همبستگی پیرسون و رگرسیون چندگانه (به شیوه­ی همزمان) بود.
یافته ها: نتایج نشان داد که ضریب همبستگی پیرسون بین دشواری تنظیم هیجان با تصویر بدنی برابر با 37/0 - و در سطح (P<0/05) معنی ­دار است. همچنین ضریب همبستگی بین بدریخت انگاری بدنی و تنظیم هیجان 383/0 و ضریب همبستگی بین عدم تحمل بلاتکلیفی و دشواری تنظیم هیجان 24/0 و در سطح (P<0/05 ) رابطه مثبت و معنی داری دارند.
نتیجه گیری: بنابراین در پژوهش حاضر میزان عدم بلاتکلیفی در اختلال بدریخت انگاری بدن نسبت به تنظیم هیجانی تفاوت معنادار داشت و این حاکی از ارتباط بسیار قدرتمند عدم بلاتکلیفی با تنظیم هیجانی هست و نه عدم ارتباط عدم بلاتکلیفی و اختلال بدریخت انگاری بدن.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Investigating the relationship between body image, deformity and intolerance of uncertainty with emotional regulation of adolescent girls

نویسندگان [English]

  • Sara Altafi Farkoosh 1
  • Shohre Ghorban Shiroodi 2
1 Master of Family Counseling, Islamic Azad University, North Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran.
2 Corresponding author, Associate Professor, Department of Psychology, Islamic Azad University, Tonekabon Branch, Tonekabon, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Introduction: body dysmorphic disorder is an inactive disease with a high prevalence worldwide. The present study was to investigate the relationship between body image, ugliness and intolerance of uncertainty with emotional regulation of adolescent girls.
Research method: The research method of this research was correlational and the research population was all female high school students in the 5th district of Tehran, of which 150 students were selected to conduct the research. The research tools include the Intolerance of Indecision Scale (IUS) by Freeston et al. (1994), the Intolerance of Indecision Scale (IUS) by Freeston et al. (1994), the 34-question body shape scale, and a questionnaire on the individual's attitude about his body image (Cash and Mollica, 1990) was the statistical method of the research included parametric tests of Pearson's correlation coefficient and multiple regression (simultaneously).
Findings: The results showed that the Pearson correlation coefficient between the difficulty of emotional regulation and body image is equal to -0.37 and is significant at the level of (P<0.05). Also, the correlation coefficient between body ugliness and emotion regulation is 0.383 and the correlation coefficient between uncertainty intolerance and emotion regulation difficulty is 0.24 and has a positive and significant relationship at the level (P<0.05).
 
Conclusion: Therefore, in the present study, the degree of indecisiveness in body dysmorphic disorder had a significant difference compared to emotional regulation, and this indicates a very strong relationship between indecisiveness and emotional regulation, and not the lack of relationship between indecisiveness and body dysmorphic disorder.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • emotion regulation
  • body dysmorphic disorder (BDD)
  • intolerance of uncertainty (IU)
  • body shape image
  1. 1.Ganji, Mehdi, DSM-5 psychopathology, translator: Ganji. Tehran. Savalan publication. Third edition; 2014.

    1. Zoghipaidar MR., Karami A., Nabizadeh S.. Compare body image disorder, body dysmorphic disorder and fashion trends in cosmetic surgery applicants and non-applicants, J Health Psychology, 2018; 7(26): 7-24.
    2. Summers B.J., Matheny N.L., Sarawgi S., Cougle J.R.. Intolerance of uncertainty in body dysmorphic disorder. Body Image; 2016; 16: 45-53.
    3. Dugas M.J., Hedayati M., Karavidas A., Buhr K., Francis K., Phillips N.. A. Intolerance of uncertainty and information processing: Evidence of biased recall and interpretations. Cognitive therapy and research, 2005; 29(1): 57-70.
    4. Buhlmann U., Etcoff N. L., Wilhelm S.. Facial attractiveness ratings and perfectionism in body dysmorphic disorder and obsessive-compulsive disorder. Journal of anxiety disorders; 2008; 22(3): 540-547.
    5. Bohon C., Hembacher E., Moller H., Moody T. D., Feusner J.D. Nonlinear relationships between anxiety and visual processing of own and others’ faces in body dysmorphic disorder. Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging; 2012; 204(2): 132-139.
    6. Zakeri M., Hasani J., Esmaeili N. Effectiveness of Processing Emotion Regulation Strategies Training (PERST) in Alexithymia of Patient with Psoriasis. J Clinical Psychology, 2017; 9(2): 97-111.
    7. Gratz K.L., Rosenthal M.Z., Tull M.T., Lejuez C.W., Gunders J.G. An experimental investigation of emotion dysregulation in borderline personality disorder. J of Abnormal Psychology; 2006 115(4): 850– 855.

    9.Kun B., Demetrovics Z. Emotional intelligence and addictions: A systematic review. Substance Use & Misuse,; 2010; 45(7-8): 1131–1160.

    1. Poursharifi H., Hashemi nosrat abad T., Ahmadi M. Comparison of body image problems and social physique anxiety between obese and normal weight adolescents: the moderating role of sociocultural influence on weight loss and body change. Qualterly j health psychology , 2017; 6(21): 86-103.
    2. Mikolajczak M., Petrides K. V., Hurry J. Adolescents choosing self- harm as an emotion regulation strategy: The protective role of trait emotional intelligence. British J Clinical Psychology, 2019; 48(2): 181–193.
    3. Wilhelm S., Phillips K.A., Steketee G. Cognitive-behavioral therapy for body dysmorphic disorder: A treatment manual. New York: Guilford Press; 2018.
    4. Jafferany M., Franca K., Vashi N.A. Diagnosis of Body dysmorphic disorder. In N. A. Vashi, (Ed), Beauty and Body Dysmorphic Disorder, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2018: 103-113
    5. Greenberg J.L., Mothi S.S., Wilhelm S. Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Body Dysmorphic Disorder by Proxy. Behavior Therapy; 2016; 47(4): 515-526. Doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2016.01.002.
    6. Phillips K.A. Body dysmorphic disorder: Clinical aspects and relationship to obsessive-compulsive disorder. Clinical Cynthesis; 2015; 13(2): 162-174.
    7. Kesler S.R., Lacayo N.J., Jo B. A pilot study of an online cognitive rehabilitation program for executive function skills in children with cancer-related brain injury. Brain Injury, 2020; 25(1): 101–112.
    8. Sadock B.J., Sadock V.A. Kaplan, Sadock S. Synopsis of Psychiatry/ Behavioral Sciences/ Clinical psychiatry. 10 th ed.Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams & Willkins; 2007: 110-8
    9. Tashke M., Davazdah emami M. H., Bakhtiyari M., Jafari M. Comparision of intolerance of uncertainity and difficulties in emotion regulation in individuals with Body Dysmorphic and Social Anxiety, Quarterly j health of psychology, 2018; 7(27): 113-130.